In re Anais B.
This text of 91 A.D.3d 443 (In re Anais B.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The court’s finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Although the victim did not identify appellant as one of her assailants, appellant’s confession established her accessorial liability. The evidence also warranted the inference that appellant intended to cause physical injury to the victim. Concur — Saxe, J.E, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Manzanet-Daniels and Román, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.3d 443, 935 N.Y.2d 514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-anais-b-nyappdiv-2012.