in Re: Ana Rodriguez
This text of in Re: Ana Rodriguez (in Re: Ana Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed December 11, 2018
S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01477-CV
IN RE ANA RODRIGUEZ, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-00627
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to
vacate two discovery orders. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the
trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re
Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record
before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly,
we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny
the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE
181477F.P05
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re: Ana Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ana-rodriguez-texapp-2018.