in Re: Ana Rodriguez

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 11, 2018
Docket05-18-01477-CV
StatusPublished

This text of in Re: Ana Rodriguez (in Re: Ana Rodriguez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
in Re: Ana Rodriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Denied and Opinion Filed December 11, 2018

S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-01477-CV

IN RE ANA RODRIGUEZ, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 44th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-00627

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Evans, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Francis In this original proceeding, relator seeks a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to

vacate two discovery orders. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the

trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re

Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record

before us, we conclude relator has not shown she is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly,

we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny

the petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

/Molly Francis/ MOLLY FRANCIS JUSTICE

181477F.P05

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America
148 S.W.3d 124 (Texas Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
in Re: Ana Rodriguez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ana-rodriguez-texapp-2018.