in Re: AMSE Partners, LP, Scott Horton, and Pam Horton
Opinion
Denied and Opinion Filed September 16, 2015.
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-15-01116-CV
IN RE AMSE PARTNERS, LP, SCOTT HORTON, AND PAM HORTON, Relators
Original Proceeding from the 134th Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-15-07537
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang-Miers, Stoddart, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Stoddart Relators filed this petition for writ of mandamus requesting that the Court compel the
trial court to abate all proceedings pending the determination of competing motions in the 191st
Judicial District Court concerning the disposition of funds deposited in the registry of the 191st
Judicial District Court. Ordinarily, to obtain mandamus relief a relator must show both that the
trial court has clearly abused its discretion and that the relator has no adequate appellate remedy.
In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the
record before the Court, we conclude that the relators have not established a right to relief.
We deny the petition.
/Craig Stoddart/ 151116F.P05 CRAIG STODDART JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
in Re: AMSE Partners, LP, Scott Horton, and Pam Horton (in Re: AMSE Partners, LP, Scott Horton, and Pam Horton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.