in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc.

DecidedAugust 27, 2006

Docket14-06-00600-CV

StatusPublished

This text of in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc. (in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006.

n The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00600-CV

IN RE AMOCO OIL COMPANY, AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, and BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 11, 2006, relators, Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company, and BP Corporation North America, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court and, on August 1, 2006, filed a motion to stay trial court proceedings. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10. Relators sought an order from this court compelling the Honorable Mark Davidson, presiding judge of the 11th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to vacate his order denying relators= plea to the jurisdiction.

On August 10, 2006, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because the underlying litigation has been settled. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and deny relators= motion to stay the trial court proceedings as moot.

PER CURIAM

Petition Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006

Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006.

n The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-06-00600-CV

IN RE AMOCO OIL COMPANY, AMOCO CHEMICAL COMPANY, and BP CORPORATION NORTH AMERICA, INC.,

Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

On July 11, 2006, relators, Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company, and BP Corporation North America, Inc., filed a petition for writ of mandamus in this court and, on August 1, 2006, filed a motion to stay trial court proceedings. See Tex. Gov=t Code Ann. '22.221 (Vernon 2004); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10. Relators sought an order from this court compelling the Honorable Mark Davidson, presiding judge of the 11th District Court, Harris County, Texas, to vacate his order denying relators= plea to the jurisdiction.

On August 10, 2006, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus because the underlying litigation has been settled. We grant the motion.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus and deny relators= motion to stay the trial court proceedings as moot.

PER CURIAM

Petition Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2006.

Panel consists of Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Seymore.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

in Re Amoco Oil Company, Amoco Chemical Company and BP Corporation North America Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amoco-oil-company-amoco-chemical-company-and-texapp-2006.