In Re Amis

Court of Appeals of Texas

In Re Amis

307 S.W.3d 357, 2009 WL 3786329

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 25, 2010·No. 04-09-00712-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On November 2, 2009, relator Steven L. Amis filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the presiding judge of the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas to rule on various post-conviction motions. The motions relate to Cause No. 2000-CR-6068, styled The State of Texas v. Steven Lee Amis, which was heard in the 226th Judicial District Court, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding. However, the judgment in that cause is final and no post-conviction proceeding is pending in the trial court. Relator is therefore not entitled to the relief sought and the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

On November 2, 2009, relator Steven L. Amis filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, seeking to compel the presiding judge of the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas to rule on various post-conviction motions. The motions relate to Cause No. 2000-CR-6068, styled The State of Texas v. Steven Lee Amis, which was heard in the 226th Judicial District Court, the Honorable Sid L. Harle presiding. However, the judgment in that cause is final and no post-conviction proceeding is pending in the trial court. Relator is therefore not entitled to the relief sought and the petition for a writ of mandamus is DENIED. Tex.R.App. P. 52.8(a).

In Re Amis, 307 S.W.3d 357, 2009 WL 3786329 (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

307 S.W.3d 357 (In Re Amis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related