in Re Amir Powell

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-20-00168-CR

IN RE Amir POWELL

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice

Delivered and Filed: April 1, 2020 PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED Relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus and an application for leave to file his petition. We deny as moot relator’s request to file a petition for writ of mandamus because leave is not required to file a petition in an intermediate appellate court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.1; In re Medina, 04-19-00041-CR, 2019 WL 360534, at *1 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 30, 2019, no pet.).

In his petition, relator asks this court to direct the trial court to release him from custody.

Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore, he is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated as presenting nothing for

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019CR11442, styled The State of Texas v. Amir Powell, pending in the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Kevin M. O’Connell presiding.

04-20-00168-CR

this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding). Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish