In re Amezquita-Franco
This text of 600 F. App'x 163 (In re Amezquita-Franco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[164]*164Petition dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
David Amezquita-Franco petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. The district court has now ruled on Amezquita-Franco’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
600 F. App'x 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amezquita-franco-ca4-2015.