In re Amerisure Insurance Co.

29 S.W.3d 656, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7552, 2000 WL 1644457
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 1, 2000·No. No. 10-00-354-CV·Published

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Mnerisure Insurance Company petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against Respondent, the Honorable Ralph Strother, Judge of the 19th District Court of McLennan County. However, the mandamus record provided by Amerisure reflects that the Honorable Bill Logue presided over the hearing in which Amerisure sought to compel the real party in interest to submit to a medical examination under Rule of Civil Procedure 204. Judge Logue signed the order denying Amerisure’s motion. Amerisure has failed to name the proper respondent. We deny the petition.1 See Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex.1984) (orig.proceeding); Gaal v. Townsend, 77 Tex. 464, 465, 14 S.W. 365, 365 (1890); Pelt v. Johnson, 818 S.W.2d 212, 215 (Tex.App. — Waco 1991, orig. proceeding); City of Beaumont v. Stephenson, 95 S.W.2d 1360, 1364-65 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1936, writ dism’d); Tex.R.App.P. 52.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Amerisure Insurance Co., 29 S.W.3d 656, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7552, 2000 WL 1644457 (Tex. Ct. App. 2000).

29 S.W.3d 656 (In re Amerisure Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pelt v. Johnson
818 S.W.2d 212 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1991)
Jampole v. Touchy
673 S.W.2d 569 (Texas Supreme Court, 1984)
City of Beaumont v. Stephenson
95 S.W.2d 1360 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Gaal v. Townsend
14 S.W. 365 (Texas Supreme Court, 1890)