In re Amerisure Insurance Co.
This text of 29 S.W.3d 656 (In re Amerisure Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
Mnerisure Insurance Company petitions this Court to issue a writ of mandamus against Respondent, the Honorable Ralph Strother, Judge of the 19th District Court of McLennan County. However, the mandamus record provided by Amerisure reflects that the Honorable Bill Logue presided over the hearing in which Amerisure sought to compel the real party in interest to submit to a medical examination under Rule of Civil Procedure 204. Judge Logue signed the order denying Amerisure’s motion. Amerisure has failed to name the proper respondent. We deny the petition.1 See Jampole v. Touchy, 673 S.W.2d 569, 572 (Tex.1984) (orig.proceeding); Gaal v. Townsend, 77 Tex. 464, 465, 14 S.W. 365, 365 (1890); Pelt v. Johnson, 818 S.W.2d 212, 215 (Tex.App. — Waco 1991, orig. proceeding); City of Beaumont v. Stephenson, 95 S.W.2d 1360, 1364-65 (Tex.Civ.App.—Beaumont 1936, writ dism’d); Tex.R.App.P. 52.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 S.W.3d 656, 2000 Tex. App. LEXIS 7552, 2000 WL 1644457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amerisure-insurance-co-texapp-2000.