In Re American Atomics Corporation

2 B.R. 526, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 539, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5682, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1303
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
DecidedJanuary 18, 1980
DocketBankruptcy 79-00825
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 B.R. 526 (In Re American Atomics Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re American Atomics Corporation, 2 B.R. 526, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 539, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5682, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1303 (Ark. 1980).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM ORDER

WILLIAM A. SCANLAND, Bankruptcy Judge.

Tucson Unified School District No. One of Pima County filed a motion that it or its representative be appointed to the Creditors’ Committee in these proceedings. The motion came on for argument on January 16, 1980, at 9:30 A.M. Tucson Unified School District No. One of Pima County has a contingent claim for damages against the debtor and an action for such damages has been filed in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona in and for the County of Pima. The school district admitted in its memorandum supporting its motion that it is a governmental agency.

11 U.S.C. § 1102(a) of the Reform Bankruptcy Code provides that the Bankruptcy *527 Court can appoint á Creditors’ Committee of persons that hold the seven largest claims against the debtor if they are willing to serve.

A “person” is defined under Section 101(30) as follows: . . ‘person’ includes individual, partnership, and corporation” but does not include governmental units. Section 101(21) defines a governmental unit as United States; State; Commonwealth; District; Territory; municipality; foreign state; department, agency or instrumentality of the United States, a State, a Commonwealth, a District, a Territory, a municipality, or a foreign state; or other foreign or domestic government.

House Report No. 95-595 of the 95th Congress concludes, “the Court is restricted to the appointment of persons in order to exclude governmental holders of claims and interest.”

For such reasons, the motion of Tucson Unified School District No. One of Pima County is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Dow Corning Corp.
194 B.R. 121 (E.D. Michigan, 1996)
In Re VTN, Inc.
65 B.R. 278 (S.D. Florida, 1986)
Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.
38 B.R. 802 (S.D. Ohio, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 B.R. 526, 1 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 539, 1980 Bankr. LEXIS 5682, 5 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-american-atomics-corporation-arb-1980.