In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES

200 So. 3d 746, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 377, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1992, 2016 WL 4702875
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 8, 2016
DocketSC16-166
StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 746 (In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES, 200 So. 3d 746, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 377, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1992, 2016 WL 4702875 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

BACKGROUND

The Florida Bar’s Small Claims Rules Committee (Committee) has filed its regular-cycle report proposing amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules (Small Claims Rules). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(b). The Committee proposes amendments to the following Small Claims Rules: 7.050 (Commencement of Action; Statement of Claim), 7.080 (Service and Filing of Pleadings and Documents Other Than Statement of Claim), 7.090 (Appearance; Defensive Pleadings; Trial Date), and 7.160 (Failure of Plaintiff or Both Parties to Appear). The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously approved the proposals. Consistent with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(b)(2), the Committee published the proposed amendments for comment prior to filing them with the Court. No comments were received by the Committee. After the Committee’s report was submitted to the Court, the proposed amendments were again published for comment. No comments were received by the Court.

Upon consideration, we adopt the amendments to rules 7.050, 7.090, and *747 7.160 as proposed by the Committee. We adopt modified amendments to rule 7.080, as further explained below.

AMENDMENTS

Rule 7.050

Rule 7.050 is amended to correct a mistaken cross-reference. Currently subdivision (e) of rule 7.050 includes a reference to rule 7.050(d) (Memorandum on Hearing Date); however, the correct reference should be to rule 7.090(b) (Notice to Appear; Pretrial Conference) which addresses pretrial conferences. Thus, the last line of subdivision, (e) is amended to correct this error.

Rule 7.080

The Committee proposes amendments to rule 7.080(b). The Committee indicates that its proposed amendments are meant to address e-mail service for parties not represented by an attorney. Service on and by parties not represented by an attorney is expressly addressed by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516(b)(1)(C), which provides:

(C) Service on and by Parties Not Represented by an Attorney. Any party not represented by an attorney may serve a designation of a primary e-mail address and also may designate no more than two secondary e-mail addresses to which service must be directed in that proceeding by the means provided in subdivision (b)(1) of this rule. If a party not represented by an attorney does not designate an e-mail address for service in a proceeding, service on and by that party must be by the means provided in subdivision (b)(2) of this rule.

Subdivision (b)(1) of rule 2.516 describes service by e-mail and e-service through the Florida Courts E-filing Portal. Subdivision (b)(2) of rule 2.516 sets forth service “by other means,” including service by mail, by hand delivery to an attorney’s or party’s office, and by faxing to an attorney’s or party’s office.

The Committee’s proposal would divide subdivision (b) of rule 7.080 into two new subdivisions (b)(1) and (b)(2), addressing service when a party is represented by an attorney and when a party is unrepresented, respectively. However, we are concerned that, as proposed, the amendments do not appear to provide sufficiently clear guidance and may be confusing, especially for pro se parties who will likely be involved in small claims matters. Accordingly, we amend rule 7.080(b) to simply incorporate the provisions of Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 governing service by e-mail as follows:

(b) How Made. When a party is represented by an attorney, service of papers other than the statement of claim and notice to appear shall be made on the attorney unless the court orders service to be made on the party. When-an attorney — is.serving another attorney) sService on an attorney or a party not represented by an attorney must be made in compliance with the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration 2.516. In- all other-instances, service must be made- by — delivering-the -paper-to.-the may be,-or-by -mailing it to-4he- party’s last known-address.

We adopt other amendments to rule 7.080 as proposed by the Committee, Current subdivision (d) provides that the filing of documents is made by filing them with the.clerk, except that a judge may permit documents to be filed with the judge, in which case the judge must note thereon the filing date and, transmit them to the clerk, who must file them as of the same day they were filed with the judge, Additionally, .it provides that parties represented by an attorney must file documents *748 in compliance with the electronic filing (e-filing) requirements of the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration; parties not represented by an attorney “may file documents in compliance with the e-filing requirement if pennitted by the Florida Rules of. Judicial Administration.” This subdivision is amended to add a specific reference to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.525 in the sentence pertaining to filing by parties represented by an attorney.

Finally, current subdivision (e) of rule 7.080 provides language for a certificate of service as follows: “I hereby certify that a copy hereof has been furnished to (here insert name or names and address or addresses) by (delivery)(mail)(e~mail if an attorney) on ... date....” In contemplation of unrepresented parties participating in email service, this language is amended to delete the words “if an attorney” after the word “e-mail.”

Rule 7.090

Rule 7.090 is amended to address concerns regarding “non-served” parties. According to the Committee’s report, in several Florida counties, plaintiffs are required to attend the pretrial conference even when there is verified non-service of the defendant e-filed with the court. In those counties, if a plaintiff fails to attend the pretrial conference, the court dismisses the case. To address this issue, subdivision (a) (Appearance) is amended to state that the requirement that a party appear at the pretrial conference is subject to the notice provisions in subdivision (b) (Notice to Appear; Pretrial Conference). Subdivision (b) (Notice to Appear; Pretrial Conference) is also amended to create an exception when a return of non-service is filed at least five days prior to a pretrial conference. In that instance, the court would be required to cancel the pretrial conference as to any non-served party. The plaintiff is then provided the opportunity to request a new summons, along with a new initial appearance date for a pretrial conference. These amendments are intended to protect the due process rights of parties who have not been properly served and create uniformity among the courts by putting guidelines in place that do not currently exist.

Finally, subdivisions (d) (Trial Date) and (f) (Appearance at Mediation; Sanctions) are rephrased for grammatical purposes.

Rule 7.160

Rule 7.160 is amended' to include references to rule 7.090(b) (Notice to Appear; Pretrial Conference).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 3d 746, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 377, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1992, 2016 WL 4702875, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-small-claims-rules-fla-2016.