In re Amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules

785 So. 2d 401, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 827, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2274, 2000 WL 1508546
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided October 12, 2000·No. No. SC00-729·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the quadrennial report of The Florida Bar Small Claims Rules Committee (“Committee”) proposing rule changes in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(8). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(2), the Committee’s proposed changes were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, and the Board recommended acceptance of the Committee’s proposed changes. The Committee’s proposals were subsequently published pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(4), and we have received many helpful comments regarding the Committee’s proposals.

MAJOR PROPOSED CHANGE

The major substantive change proposed by the Committee was the adoption of a simplified answer system which would require small claims defendants to file an answer form following receipt of a statement of claim.1 Presently, there is no requirement that defendants file an answer, and the parties are required to attend a pretrial conference with the trial judge following the service of a notice to appear. The Committee’s proposal was prompted by a concern that in certain instances, such as a default, parties were required to appear in court unnecessarily. The Committee also seeks to assist small claims judges in managing their pretrial dockets by providing a mechanism for determining whether a case was contested prior to pretrial. While we applaud the Committee’s initiative in seeking to alleviate court congestion and unnecessary court appearances in the instant proposal, we decline to adopt the Committee’s simplified answer system, as proposed, at this time.

[402] We have received comments in opposition to this proposed change from many interested parties, including county court judges and Florida Legal Services, and we agree with many of the reservations raised by these commentators. In addition, Judge Drayton-Harris, the Fourth Judicial Circuit’s representative to the Florida Conference of County Court Judges, indicated at oral argument that the Conference 'had considered and now opposed the simplified answer system as it is presently proposed.

However, we also believe that the Committee’s concerns are valid, and deserve further attention and consideration. It is apparent that the Committee and the many commentators have the same goals in mind: a system that is open and helpful to those that appear in small claims court, many of whom appear’ pro se and are unfamiliar with legal proceedings; and a system that is efficient and not wasteful of court resources and people’s time. We believe small claims court can be both efficient and fair, and we will be open to consideration of the issue highlighted to us by the Committee in the future. We encourage further evaluation of this issue by those interested and affected parties2 through the committee process, and direct the Committee to readdress the issue after seeking the widest possible input from those affected, and especially the county judges.

With the exception of the proposed amendments which would have implemented the simplified answer system, we adopt the remainder of the Committee’s proposed changes. We also agree with and adopt the proposal of George J.F. Werner to amend Florida Small Claims Rule 7.070. A brief summary of these amendments follows.

Rule 7.070, Method of Service of Process, is amended to provide that attorneys, as well as clerks of court, may effectuate service of process by certified mail. We agree with Mr. Werner that service is being carried out by the United States Postal Service regardless of the identity of the sender, and therefore either attorneys, as officers of the court, or clerks of court should be permitted to send the certified mail.3

Rule 7.080, Service of Pleadings and Papers Other than Statement of Claim, is amended to provide that in the event an unrepresented party fails to indicate service on other parties when filing a document with the court, the clerk of court will serve a copy on all parties.

[403] Rule 7.090, Appearance; Defensive Pleadings; Trial Date, is amended to provide that a party need not appear in person at mediation if the party is represented by an attorney or if a nonlawyer representative has signed authority to appear on the party’s behalf. However, when a party is so represented at mediation, the attorney or representative must have full authority to settle without consultation. The rule is also amended to provide that agreements reached in mediation are to be stipulated to in writing, and that the court may enter the stipulation as an order. We also adopt the proposed amendment to this rule which provides that the parties may stipulate to an extension of time for setting the case for trial.

Form 7.345, Stipulation for Installment Settlement and Stay, and Order Approving Stipulation,4 presently provides that once the parties stipulate to a settlement, the cause is stayed until such time as the installments are paid in full or the stipulation is violated. We amend the form to provide that under these circumstances, the cause be dismissed, but with the caveat that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the stipulation.5

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Small Claims Rules as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deleted language is indicated by overstriking. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 2001, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE

(a) Title. These rules shall be cited as Florida Small Claims Rules and may be abbreviated “Fla. Sm. Cl. R.” These rules shall be construed to implement the simple, speedy, and inexpensive trial of actions at law in county courts.

(b) Scope. These rules are applicable to all actions at law of a civil nature in the county courts in which the demand or value of property involved does not exceed $5,000 exclusive of costs, interest, and attorneys’ feesj. iI f there is a difference between the time period prescribed by these rules and section 51.011, Florida Statutes, the statutory provision shall govern.

Committee Notes

1978 Amendment. The addition to (b) is designed to eliminate confusion caused by denomination of section 51.011, Florida Statutes, as “Summary Procedure.”

RULE 7.020. APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(a) Generally. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.090(a), (b), and (c); 1.190(e); 1.210(b); 1.260; 1.410; and 1.560 are applicable in all actions covered by these rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules, 785 So. 2d 401, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 827, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2274, 2000 WL 1508546 (Ala. 2000).

785 So. 2d 401 (In re Amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.