In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Court

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2023
DocketSC2022-1276
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Court (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Court, (Fla. 2023).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2022-1276 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF TRAFFIC COURT.

April 27, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Traffic Court Rules Committee (Committee)

has filed a report proposing amendments to Florida Rules of Traffic

Court 6.040 (Definitions), 6.130 (Case Consolidation), 6.445

(Discovery: Infractions Only), 6.455 (Amendments), and 6.490

(Correction and Reduction of Penalty). 1

The Committee and the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar

approved the proposed amendments. The Committee published its

proposal for comment in The Florida Bar News prior to filing it with

the Court and received no comments. After the Committee filed its

report, the Court published the proposals for comment. No

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). comments were received. Having considered the Committee’s

remaining proposals, the Court hereby amends Florida Rules of

Traffic Court 6.040, 6.130, 6.455, and 6.490 as proposed. 2 The

more significant amendments are discussed below.

First, subdivision (p) of rule 6.040 is amended to clarify that

“open court” proceedings may be “virtual or physical.” Next, rule

6.130 is amended to require that multiple citations arising out of

the same incident be heard together unless there is a request to

have the citations heard separately. Rule 6.455 is amended to

address an issuing officer’s voluntary dismissal of a charging

document. Finally, rule 6.490 is amended to enlarge the timeframe

during which an official may reduce a legal penalty from 60 days to

180 days.

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Traffic Court are amended as

set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated

by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type.

The amendments shall become effective July 1, 2023, at 12:01 a.m.

2. On our own motion, the Court severs the Committee’s proposed amendments to rule 6.445, which will be considered in a separate case, In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Traffic Court 6.445, No. SC2023-0548. -2- It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Traffic Court

Andrew Joseph Decker IV, Chair, Traffic Court Rules Committee, Lake City, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Michael Hodges, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-3- Appendix

RULE 6.040. DEFINITIONS

The following definitions apply:

(a)-(o) [No Change]

(p) “Open court” means in a courtroom as provided or, whether virtual or physical, and includes a judge’s or traffic hearing officer’s chambers of suitable judicial decorum.

(q)-(x) [No Change]

Committee Notes [No Change]

RULE 6.130. CASE CONSOLIDATION

When a defendant is cited for the commission of both a criminal and a civil traffic violation, or both a civil traffic infraction requiring a mandatory hearing and a civil traffic infraction not requiring a hearing, the cases may be heard simultaneously if they arose out of the same set of facts.

When a defendant is cited for more than one civil traffic violation arising out of the same set of facts, all cases must be heard at the same time, before the same official, absent a request for the cases to be heard separately.

However, in no case shall a traffic hearing officer hear a criminal traffic case or a case involving a civil traffic infraction issued in conjunction with a criminal traffic offense.

Under any of these circumstances the civil traffic infraction shall be treated as continued for the purpose of reporting to the department. Prior to the date of the scheduled hearing or trial, a defendant may dispose of any nonmandatory civil traffic infraction

-4- in the manner provided by these rules and section 318.14, Florida Statutes.

Committee Notes

[No Change]

RULE 6.455. AMENDMENTS AND VOLUNTARY DISMISSALS BY ISSUING OFFICERS

(a) Amendments. The charging document may be amended by the issuing officer in open court at the time of a scheduled hearing before it commences, subject to the approval of the official. The official shall grant a continuance if the amendment requires one in the interests of justice. No case shall be dismissed by reason of any informality or irregularity in the charging instrument.

(b) Voluntary Dismissals. Upon an issuing officer filing a written notice of dismissal, a written request for dismissal, or a request for dismissal made in open court, the clerk of the court shall enter the dismissal in the court records.

RULE 6.490. CORRECTION AND REDUCTION OF PENALTY

(a) [No Change]

(b) Reduction of Penalty. An official may reduce a legal penalty:

(1) within 60180 days after its imposition, or thereafter with good cause shown;

(2)-(4) [No Change]

-5-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-traffic-court-fla-2023.