In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

608 So. 2d 478, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 709, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1869, 1992 WL 319938
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 5, 1992
DocketNo. 79591
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 608 So. 2d 478 (In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, 608 So. 2d 478, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 709, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1869, 1992 WL 319938 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Juvenile Court Rules Committee of The Florida Bar has petitioned this Court to approve its quadrennial report of proposed changes to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure. We have jurisdiction based on article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution. As required by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130, the amendments were submitted to The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for review. The Board unanimously recommended the approval of the rules, with the exception of proposed rule 8.145. The Board made a separate recommendation concerning rule 8.145. Additional comments have been received by the Juvenile Committee of The Florida Public Defender Association (Public Defenders) concerning proposed rules 8.102, 8.104, 8.145.

In its report, the Juvenile Court Rules Committee proposed rule 8.102, a new rule that tracks the language of section 92.53, Florida Statutes (1991), for the videotaping of testimony of a victim of sexual or child abuse who is under the age of sixteen years. Section 92.53 clearly sets out the circumstances under which the videotaping of the victim or witness’s testimony may be accomplished. Thus, we decline to adopt the proposed rule because it would be du-plicative of the statute.

The Public Defenders make three contentions regarding proposed rule 8.104 which allows a child witness to testify by closed-circuit television. First, the Public Defenders argue that the proposed rule is too broad because it goes beyond the language of section 92.54, Florida Statutes (1991), which allows a child to give closed-circuit television testimony in cases involving sex[479]*479ual offenses against victims under the age of sixteen. In contrast, the proposed rule allows for such testimony in both sexual offenses as well as “child abuse” cases. We find that the rule should track the language of section 92.54, thus we delete the inclusion of “child abuse” from the proposed rule. Second, both the Public Defenders and the Juvenile Court Rules Committee agree that rule 8.104(c) should be amended to track the language of section 92.54 to include that the “defendant child’s attorney” be present at the closed-circuit testimony. We agree, and add the “defendant child’s attorney” to proposed subsection (c) of rule 8.104. Finally, the Public Defenders point out that rule 8.104(a)(2) does track the language of section 92.54 which allows a trial court to order an “unavailable” witness to give testimony by closed-circuit television. However, they argue that subsection 8.104(a)(2), like section 92.54, has the strange effect of allowing the court to take a witness’s testimony by closed-circuit television, if the witness is unavailable as defined by section 90.804(1). Under section 90.804(1) a witness may be “unavailable” because of a ruling of a court granting a privilege against testifying, physical absence, refusal to testify, lack of memory, or a physical or mental illness. In any event, logic dictates that an “unavailable” witness will not be testifying on closed-circuit television; thus we delete proposed subsection (a)(2) of rule 8.104. While the revised rule 8.104 tracks the language of section 92.54, it is different from the statute because it does not contain the confusing language allowing the trial court to order the close-circuit testimony of an “unavailable” witness. Thus, we adopt rule 8.104 with its noted revisions.

Proposed rules 8.145 and 8.275 concern the appeals of delinquency and dependency actions. The Juvenile Court Rules Committee has filed a motion with this Court to strike the proposed rules to allow either the Juvenile Court Rules Committee or the Appellate Court Rules Committee to submit more comprehensive and detailed rules. We agree with the Juvenile Court Rules Committee and will defer any action on these proposed appellate rules until resubmission by the appropriate committee.

We approve the remainder of the proposed changes. Appended is the text of the amended portions of the rules. The amended rules become effective at midnight on January 1, 1993. Deletions are indicated by the use of struck-through type; new language is indicated by underscoring. Committee comments are included for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

PART I. DELINQUENCY PROCEEDINGS

A. INTRODUCTORY- RULES

RULE 8.000. SCOPE AND PURPOSE

These rules shall govern the procedures in the circuit court in the exercise of its jurisdiction under the Florida Juvenile Justice Act.

They are intended to provide a just, speedy, and efficient determination of the procedures covered by them and shall be construed to secure simplicity in procedure and fairness in administration.

They shall be known as the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure and may be cited as Fla.R.Juv.P.

When appropriate the use of singular nouns and pronouns shall be construed to include the plural and the use of plural nouns and pronouns shall be construed to include the singular.

Committee Notes

1991 Amendment. All rules have been edited for style and to remove gender-bias gender bias. The rules have been reorganized and renumbered to correspond to the types and stages of juvenile proceedings. Cross-references have been changed accordingly.

1992 Amendment. Scope and Purpose, previously found in rules 8.000, 8.200, [480]*4808.600, and 8.700, has been consolidated into one rule. Designations of subparts within the delinquency part of the rules have been changed accordingly. Reference to the civil rules, previously found in rule 8.200, has been removed because the rules governing dependency and termination of parental rights proceedings are self-contained and no longer need to reference the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

BA. PRELIMINARY PROCEEDINGS

GB. PLEADINGS, PROCESS, AND ORDERS

RULE 8.035. PETITIONS FOR DELINQUENCY

(a) Contents of Petition.

(1) Each petition shall be entitled a petition for delinquency and shall allege facts showing the child to have committed a delinquent act.

(2) The petition shall contain allegations as to the identity and residence of the parents or custodians, if known.

(3) In petitions alleging delinquency, each count shall recite the official or customary citations of the statute, ordinance, rule, regulation, or other provision of the law which the child is alleged to have violated, including the degree of each offense.

(4) Two or more allegations of the commission of delinquent acts may appear in the same petition, in separate counts.

(5) Two or more children may be the subject of the same petition if they are alleged to have participated in the same act or transaction or in the same series of acts or transactions constituting an offense or offenses. The children may be named in one 1 or more counts together or separately and all of them need not be named in each count.

(b) Verification. The petition shall be signed by the state attorney or assistant state attorney, stating under oath the petitioner’s good faith in filing the petition. No objection to a petition on the grounds that it was not signed or verified, as herein provided, shall be entertained after a plea to the merits.

(c) Amendments.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

K.N. and D.N. v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
Riley v. State
166 So. 3d 705 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2013)
Department of Children & Families v. K.D.
84 So. 3d 1120 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Nickerson v. DEPT. OF CHILDREN & FAMILIES
718 So. 2d 373 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
608 So. 2d 478, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 709, 1992 Fla. LEXIS 1869, 1992 WL 319938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-juvenile-procedure-fla-1992.