In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2021 Fast-Track Report

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 3, 2022
DocketSC21-1681
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2021 Fast-Track Report (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2021 Fast-Track Report) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2021 Fast-Track Report, (Fla. 2022).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC21-1681 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE—2021 FAST-TRACK REPORT.

February 3, 2022

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed

amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure. See Fla. R.

Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(e). We have jurisdiction. See art.

V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar’s Juvenile Court Rules Committee (Committee)

has filed a fast-track report proposing (1) amendments to Florida

Rules of Juvenile Procedure 8.217 (Attorney Ad Litem), 8.305

(Shelter Petition, Hearing, and Order), 8.345 (Post-Disposition

Relief), and 8.415 (Judicial Review of Dependency Cases); (2) a new

rule 8.540 (Motion to Reinstate Parental Rights); (3) a new form

8.973A (Order on Judicial Review for Child Age 16); and (4) an amendment to current form 8.973A and its redesignation as form

8.973B (Order on Judicial Review for Child Age 17 or Older).

The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors unanimously approved

the Committee’s proposals. The Committee did not publish the

proposals before filing them with the Court. Having considered the

proposed amendments and relevant legislation, we hereby adopt the

amendments as proposed, with one minor modification for

amending the form 8.973 orders. The more significant amendments

are discussed below.

First, rule 8.217 is amended to conform with recent legislative

changes to section 39.522(3)(c), Florida Statutes (2021), which now

requires an attorney for the child (rather than an attorney ad litem)

to be appointed when a caregiver provides notice of objection to a

change in the child’s physical custody placement. Thus, “Attorney

for the Child” is added to the title of the rule, a sentence is added to

subdivision (b) (Appointment), explaining that the court must

appoint an attorney for a child who is the subject of a motion to

modify custody, and the phrase “an attorney ad litem” is now

replaced with the phrase “any attorney appointed under this rule.”

Additionally, a comment is added to the rule explaining that these -2- changes were made in response to the statutory changes. Each

rule change discussed herein includes such a comment.

Rule 8.305 (Shelter Petition, Hearing, and Order) is amended

to conform with the newly enacted section 39.4021, Florida

Statutes (2021), which articulates a prioritization for out-of-home

placements, including fictive kin and nonrelatives. Accordingly, the

phrase “fictive kin, or nonrelatives” is added throughout the rule.

In addition, a new subdivision (c)(3) is created stating that an order

granting shelter care must include a finding on reasonable efforts to

place the child in accordance with the prioritization hierarchy

articulated in section 39.4021 or explain why priority placement is

not available or is not in the child’s best interest. The subsequent

subdivisions have therefore been renumbered, and renumbered

subdivision (c)(5) now states that when sibling visitation or

interaction is not ordered, the shelter order must explain why

visitation or interaction is contrary to the safety or well-being of the

child and must direct the department to immediately provide

services that would reasonably be expected to ameliorate the risk to

the child’s safety or well-being and that may result in restoration of

communication and visitation if such services are available. -3- Rule 8.345 (Post-Disposition Relief) is amended to conform

with recent legislative changes to section 39.522, Florida Statutes,

which now provides that a hearing must be held if “any party or the

current caregiver denies the need for a change [to custody

placement]” and creates a rebuttable presumption that it is in the

child’s best interest to remain permanently in the current physical

placement if certain conditions are present. Accordingly, the

phrase “any party or the current caregiver” is now used in place of

the previous list of persons whose objection would require a hearing

on these matters. Also, as the amendments to section 39.522

modified the factors a court must consider when changing custody

placement and established a priority hierarchy for custody

placement, the list of factors that were previously enumerated in

subdivision (b)(1) is now replaced with a requirement for courts to

“consider the best interests factors provided by law, the report filed

by the multidisciplinary team, if applicable, and the priority of

placements as provided by law, or as otherwise provided by law.”

Also, a new subdivision (b)(2) is created to address the

rebuttable presumption described in the recently enacted section

39.522(3)(b)1, and the subsequent subdivisions are renumbered to -4- accommodate the new subdivision. New subdivision (b)(2)(A)

addresses the statutorily imposed rebuttable presumption, new

subdivision (b)(2)(B) describes how a caregiver must notify the court

of any objection to a change in physical custody, new subdivision

(b)(2)(C) describes procedures for the initial case status hearing,

and new subdivision (b)(2)(D) specifies when a court must conduct a

hearing and issue an order to effectuate a change of custody.

Rule 8.415 (Judicial Review of Dependency Cases) is amended

to address recent legislative changes to section 39.701(3), Florida

Statutes (2021), which now requires a judicial review hearing when

a dependent child turns 16. Such review was previously required

only when a child turned 17. Thus, a new subdivision (b)(3) is

added to rule 8.415 that explains the procedural requirements for

this newly required judicial review hearing, and the subsequent

subdivisions of rule 8.415 are renumbered to accommodate new

subdivision (b)(3).

Next, a new rule 8.540 (Motion to Reinstate Parental Rights) is

created to conform with the recently enacted section 39.8155,

Florida Statutes (2021). To align with section 39.8155, rule

8.540(a) states that the parent whose rights were terminated, or the -5- child, may file a motion to reinstate the parent’s parental rights, as

provided by statute. Subdivision (b) (Initial Evidentiary Hearing on

Motion) sets forth the procedures for the initial evidentiary hearing

on such a motion, including the notice requirement and the

burdens of production and persuasion. Subdivision (c) (Transition

Period) describes the court’s obligations upon determining that a

movant met its burden at the initial hearing. Subdivision (d) (Final

Evidentiary Hearing for Consideration of the Reinstatement of

Parental Rights) describes the procedures for the final hearing, at

which reinstatement of parental rights following the visitation

period is to be considered. Subdivision (e) (Retention of Jurisdiction

Following Reinstatement of Parental Rights) addresses retention of

jurisdiction following reinstatement of parental rights.

Finally, a new form is created and designated as form 8.973A,

to conform with section 39.701(3), Florida Statutes, which as stated

above now requires an additional judicial review hearing when a

dependent child turns 16. New form 8.973A specifically addresses

this judicial review hearing and states that a court will consider a

“Judicial Review Social Study Report filed by the department that

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure - 2021 Fast-Track Report, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-juvenile-procedure-2021-fla-2022.