In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.140

200 So. 3d 1221, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 413, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2149, 2016 WL 5623566
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 29, 2016
DocketSC15-1582
StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 3d 1221 (In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.140) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE AND FLORIDA RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 9.140, 200 So. 3d 1221, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 413, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2149, 2016 WL 5623566 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure & Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140, 176 So.3d 980 (Fla.2015), we amended Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.220 (Discovery) and 3.989 (Affidavit, Petition, and Order to Expunge or Seal Forms), and Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140 (Appeal Proceedings in Criminal Cases). We also adopted new criminal rules 3.781 (Sentencing Hearing to Consider the Imposition of a Life Sentence for Juvenile Offenders) and 3.802 (Review of Sentences for Juvenile Offenders). Because the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee (CPRC) and the Appellate Court Rules Committee (ACRC) filed a “fast-track” out-of-cycle report proposing the amendments, the proposals had not previously been published for comment. Accordingly, in adopting the Committees’ proposals, we provided for a period of sixty days after release of the Court’s opinion for interested persons to file comments with the Court, followed by a period of twenty-one days for the CPRC and the ACRC to file a response to any comments filed. 1 In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of Crim. Pro. & Fla. Rule of App. Pro. 9. 140, 176 So.3d at 982.

Three comments were received by the Court, including one from the Sixth Judicial Circuit pertaining to rule 3.781, one from the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (FACDL) pertaining to rule 3.802, and one from attorneys Eugenia Keough Rains and Kenneth McLaughlin pertaining to rule 9.141 (Review Proceedings in Collateral or Post-Conviction Criminal Cases). 2 After consideration of *1222 the comments filed, the CPRC and the ACRC proposed additional amendments to the criminal rules and ah amendment to rule 9.141.

We briefly discuss the new amendments to the rules as proposed and adopted by the Court. 3

First, rule 3.781 is amended by substituting in subdivision (a) (Application) the word “may” for “can,” to allow for cases in which no hearing is necessary as the parties have agreed that life imprisonment, or a term of years equal to life imprisonment, will not be sought. Next, we divide subdivision (c) (Findings) into new subdivisions (c)(l)-(c)(3). Subdivision (c)(1) adds a reference to section 921.1402(2)(a), Florida Statutes, In regard' to the sentence pertaining to capital cases, the sentence is deleted and. rewritten as (c)(2) so that it is not so broad, to make clear that a defendant''who is convicted of premeditated murder is not entitled to a sentencing review proceeding if the defendant was previously convicted of an offense enumerated in section 921.1402(2)(a). Finally, the remainder of existing subdivision (c) is new subdivision (c)(3), which provides, “A copy of the written findings shall be made a part of the commitment packet for the Department of Corrections.”

With respect to rule 3.802, we first substitute in subdivision (c) (Contents of Application) the word “state” for the word “certify.” Next, the following language is added to subdivision (c)(1):

(1) a copy of the judgment and sentence;, or a statement containing the following:
■ (A) the date of sentencing;
(B) the offense for which the defendant-was sentenced; and
(C) the sentence imposed;

In subdivision (d), we remove the second sentence (“The juvenile offender is entitled to be represented by counsel at the review hearing.”) and move it to-new subdivision (g) (Right to Counsel). In addition, the requirement that the court attach documents to an order if the court denies an application without a hearing is added to subdivision (d). Finally, we add new subdivision (g), which provides for the right to counsel previously included in subdivision (d).

Turning to rule 9.141, a reference to rule 3.802 is added to subdivisions (b), (b)(2)(A), (b)(3)(A), and (b)(3)(B)(i).

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure and the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New language is .underscored; deleted language is stricken through. The amendments to these rules shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J, and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 3.781. SENTENCING HEARING TO CONSIDER THE IMPOSITION OF A LIFE SENTENCE FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS

(a) Application. The courts shall use the following procedures in sentencing a juvenile offender for an offense which was committed after July 1, 2014, if the conviction can-may result in a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of years equal to life imprisonment, or for resentencing any *1223 juvenile offender .whose sentence is determined to be unconstitutional pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s. decision in Miller v. Alabama, — U.S.-, 132 S.Ct. 2455, 2469, 183 L.Ed.2d 407 (2012) or Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S. 48, 130 S.Ct. 2011, 176 L.Ed.2d 825 (2010).

(b) [No change]

(c) Findings.

(1) The court shall make specific findings on the record that all relevant factors have been reviewed and considered by the court prior to imposing a sentence of life imprisonment or a term of years equal to life imprisonment. The court shall make written findings as to whether the defendant is eligible for a sentence review hearing under sections 921.1402(2)(a), (2)(b), or (2)(c), Florida Statutes, based on whether the defendant killed, attempted to kill, or intended to kill the victim. .

■I-n.capital cases,' the courfe-determination.of-whether-the--defendant is eligible for — a-sentence -review.hearing is based further on whether-the-defendant-has-a previous -co-nv-iction-for-une-of-the ■ enumerated-offenses or conspiracy to commit one of the enumerated-offenses-found-in-sec■tion-92-l-.-14Q2(2)(a),-Florida Statutes.

(2) A defendant who is convicted of an offense punishable under section 775.082(l)(b)l., Florida Statutes, shall not be eligible for a sentence review hearing .if the trial court finds that the defendant has previously been convicted of one of the enumerated offenses, or conspiracy to commit one of the enumerated offenses, found in section 921.1402(2)(a), Florida Statutes.

(3) A copy of the written findings shall be made a part of the commitment packet for the Department of Corrections.

RULE 3.802. REVIEW OF SENTENCES FOR JUVENILE OFFENDERS

■ (a)-(b) [No Change]

(c) Contents of Application. The application must eertifystate that the juvenile offender is eligible for sentence review and include:

(1) a copy of the judgment and sen-tencej, or a statement containing the following:

(A) the date of sentencing;

(B) the offense for which the defendant was sentenced; and

(C) the sentence imposed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Alabama
132 S. Ct. 2455 (Supreme Court, 2012)
Graham v. Florida
176 L. Ed. 2d 825 (Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
200 So. 3d 1221, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 413, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 2149, 2016 WL 5623566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-criminal-procedure-and-florida-fla-2016.