In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 6, 2024
DocketSC2022-1719
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, (Fla. 2024).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2022-1719 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.

June 6, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Civil Procedure Rules Committee filed a

report proposing amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

1.110 (General Rules of Pleading) and 1.820 (Hearing Procedures for

Non-Binding Arbitration), and form 1.923 (Eviction

Summons/Residential). 1 The Committee also proposes the addition

of two new forms, 1.923(b) (Summons Action for Back Rent or Other

Damages) and 1.947(b) (Answer—Residential Eviction).

The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors unanimously

recommends acceptance of the proposed amendments. We

published the proposed amendments for comment and received six

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b). comments. The Committee filed a response to the comments, along

with a revised proposal.

Having fully considered this matter, we adopt the revised

amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure proposed by the

Committee, except for the proposed amendments to rule 1.820(g)(3),

which we decline to adopt. We also make a minor modification to

new form 1.947(b). We explain the reasons for these changes, as

well as some of the more significant rule amendments below.

AMENDMENTS

First, we amend rule 1.110(d) (Affirmative Defenses) to require

a party who asserts an affirmative defense in a pleading to provide a

short, plain statement of the ultimate facts that support the

avoidance or affirmative defense.

Next, we decline to adopt the Committee’s proposal to amend

rule 1.820(g)(3) (Completion of the Arbitration Process) to require

that an arbitration decision be served on the parties but not filed

with the court. The Committee proposed this change because the

move to electronic filing in recent years has made rule 1.820(g)(3)’s

requirement to file an arbitrator’s decision under seal unworkable,

as there is currently no way to shield certain parts of an electronic

-2- case file from review by the presiding judge. 2 While we agree with

the Committee that rule 1.820(g)(3) needs to be amended to better

align the rule with existing electronic filing practices, we believe

that an arbitrator’s decision needs to be filed with the court after

the arbitration process has concluded to avoid unnecessary

confusion and to ensure that the court can timely act on the

decision under rule 1.820(h) if no request for trial de novo is made.

We ask that the Committee revisit this matter and file a new

report with a revised proposal to amend rule 1.820(g)(3). One

possible solution may be to simply require arbitrators to use a

coversheet when filing their decisions with the court that clearly

reminds the presiding judge to not review the decision unless no

request for trial de novo is made. The coversheet would seemingly

serve the same purpose as filing a sealed copy of an arbitrator’s

decision—i.e., prevent the presiding judge from unwittingly

reviewing the decision as part of the electronic case file—and its use

would seemingly not significantly alter the existing procedures

2. Under section 44.103(5), Florida Statutes (2023), an arbitrator’s “decision [must] not be made known to the judge who may preside over the case unless no request for trial de novo is made . . . .”

-3- under rule 1.820. This approach is offered as a suggestion only

and is not intended in any way to limit the Committee’s

consideration of how best to address this matter.

As to rule 1.820(h), we retitle the subdivision “Notice of

Rejection of the Arbitration Decision and Request for Trial” and

amend it to clarify the process for rejecting an arbitrator’s decision

and requesting a trial de novo. Under the amended rule, an

arbitration decision will be deemed rejected only if a “notice of

rejection of the arbitration decision and request for trial” is filed

with the court within 20 days of service of the arbitrator’s written

decision.

Form 1.923 is now lettered as form 1.923(a), and we replace

the form’s existing language with the language (with some minor

modifications) from Landlord Tenant Form 7 (Eviction Summons-

Residential). The amended form clarifies what actions a defendant

must take to challenge an eviction. Also, we add new form 1.923(b).

The new form is modeled after Landlord Tenant Form 8 (Summons-

Action for Back Rent and Damages) and explains that a defendant

-4- must serve written defenses for back rent or other damages alleged

in the complaint within 20 days after service of the complaint. 3

Lastly, we add new form 1.947(b). The new form is an answer

defendants may use to respond to an eviction complaint. For added

clarity, however, we relocate language instructing defendants that

the failure to deposit rent with the clerk may result in a waiver of

any defenses from the beginning of the form to the defenses section

of the form. This will prevent defendants from having to return to

the beginning of the form for instruction on completing the defenses

section.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure are amended

as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is

indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-

through type. The amendments become effective on July 1, 2024,

at 12:01 a.m.

3. We previously approved Landlord Tenant Forms 7 and 8 under Rule Regulating The Florida Bar 10-2.1(a) (Generally; Unlicensed Practice of Law). In re Revisions to Simplified Forms Pursuant to Rule 10-2.1(A) of Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, 50 So. 3d 503, 534-35 (Fla. 2010).

-5- It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Judson Lee Cohen, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Miami Lakes, Florida, Landis V. Curry III, Past Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Heather Savage Telfer, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

Rodney G. Romano of Matrix Mediation, LLC, West Palm Beach, Florida; Hon. Michael S. Orfinger, Chair, Supreme Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy, DeLand, Florida; Kathleen S. McLeroy, Chair, Alternative Dispute Resolution Section of The Florida Bar, Tampa, Florida; Hon. Lisa Allen of the Hillsborough County Court, Tampa, Florida; Kevin S. Rabin, Co- Chair, Florida Housing Umbrella Group, Gainesville, Florida, and Jeffrey S. Hittleman, Co-Chair, Florida Housing Umbrella Group, Plantation, Florida; and Meah Rothman Tell, Tamarac, Florida,

Responding with comments

-6- APPENDIX

RULE 1.110. GENERAL RULES OF PLEADING

(a) [No Change]

(b) Claims for Relief. A pleading which sets forth a claim for relief, whether an original claim, counterclaim, crossclaim, or third- party claim, must state a cause of action and shallmust contain:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-fla-2024.