In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

190 So. 3d 999, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 68, 2016 WL 164134
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 14, 2016
DocketSC13-2384
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 190 So. 3d 999 (In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re AMENDMENTS TO the FLORIDA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 190 So. 3d 999, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 68, 2016 WL 164134 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CÚRIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. We have jurisdiction. See art. V,- § 2(a), Fla. Const, ..

BACKGROUND

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee (Committee) filed a “fash-track” out-of-cycle report, pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.140(e), proposing amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure in ' response to legislative changes.' In its report, the CQmmittee proposed amendments to Florida Rule of Civil' Procedure 1.110 and forms 1.944, 1.996(a), and 1.996(b). The Committee also proposed new rule 1.115 and several new; forms. The amended and new rules and forms were proposed in response to legislation regarding mortgage foreclosure actions. Chapter 2013-137, Laws of Florida, created section 702.015, Florida Statutes. This statutory provision sets forth pleading requirements for mortgage foreclosure. complaints intended to “expedite the foreclosure process by ensuring initial disclosure of. a plaintiffs status and the facts supporting that status, thereby en *1000 suring the availability of documents necessary to the prosecution of the case.” § 702.015(1), Fla. Stat. (2015). Chapter 2013-137 also amended section 702.10, Florida Statutes, relating to orders to show cause why a judgment of foreclosure should not be entered and hearings thereon. Ch.2013-137, § 6, Laws of Fla. The legislation became effective on June 7, 2013. Ch.2013-137, § 10, Laws of Fla. The act further specified that the pleading requirements apply to cases filed on or after July 1, 2013, and the new show cause provisions apply to cases pending on the effective date of the act. Ch.2013-137, § 8, Laws of Fla. Finally, the act requested that the Court amend the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure “to provide expedited foreclosure proceedings in conformity with this act and . \. develop and publish forms for use in such expedited proceedings.” Ch.2013-173, § 9, Laws of Fla.

Upon consideration of the Committee’s report and proposals, on December 11, 2014, the Court issued an opinion adopting the proposals and providing a sixty-day comment period. In re Amends. to Fla. R. Civ. P., 153 So.3d 258 (Fla.2014). Multiple comments were filed, and. the Committee filed a response proposing several additional amendments to the rules and forms. Upon consideration of the comments filed and the Committee’s response, we adopt the additional amendments described below.

AMENDMENTS

Rule 1.115 (Pleading Mortgage Foreclosures). Rule 1.115 specifically governs pleading requirements in foreclosure actions. The rule incorporates the requirements of section 702.015, Florida Statutes, detailing pleading requirements where the plaintiff is the holder of the original note secured by the mortgage, where the plaintiff has been delegated authority to institute an action on behalf of another who is entitled to enforce the note, and where the plaintiff seeks to enforce a lost, destroyed, or stolen note. § 702.015, Fla. Stat. (2015).

Rule 1.115 as it was proposed by the Committee and adopted by the Court closely tracks the language of this statute. The comments filed raised a number of issues with regard to the rule, two with which the Committee agrees. First, the Committee agrees that the first sentence of subdivision (a) of the rule be amended to clarify that the rule is intended to govern foreclosure of a mortgage or lien that is secured by a promissory note on residential real property. Because this provides further clarity in the rule, we adopt this amendment.

The Committee also agrees with comments suggesting that subdivision (d) of the rule be amended to add a reference to section 702.11, Florida Statutes, for completeness and clarity of “the adequate protections which must be provided before entry of judgment.” Subdivision (d) of the rule addresses lost, destroyed, or stolen instruments. In such cases the claimant is required to provide “adequate protection” against “loss that might occur by reason of a claim by another person to enforce the instrument.” § 673.3091(2), Fla. Stat. (2015). Section 702.11, Florida Statutes, also addresses adequate protection for lost, destroyed, or stolen notes in mortgage foreclosure and lists the acceptable reasonable means of providing adequate protection, “if so found by the court.” § 702.li(l), Fla. Stat. (2015)., Accordingly, because both sections 673.3091(2) and 702.11(1) are important provisions regarding adequate protections, we adopt the amendment to subdivision (d) as proposed by the Committee.

Form 1.944(a) (Mortgage Foreclosure). This form is to be used only in mortgage foreclosure cases where the location of the original note is known. The form addresses the issues of delegated au *1001 thority to institute a mortgage foreclosure action and certification of possession of the original note. As with new rule 1.115, the amendments that were made to this form closely follow the requirements for pleading set forth in section 702.015, Florida Statutes (2015). Several comments were received raising several issues. In response to the comments, the Committee has proposed amending paragraph (3)(c) of this form and' adding a new paragraph (3)(d). 'The amendments provide separate choices where the delegated authority tó institute the action comes from the holder of the original note and where it comes from one who is not the holder but who is otherwise entitled to enforce the note. Because this would provide further clarity, we adopt these amendments to form 1.944(a) as proposed by the Committee.

Form 1.944(b) (Mortgage Foreclosure). This .mortgage foreclosure complaint form is for use in mortgage foreclosure cases where the location of the original note is unknown. It incorporates the pleading requirements for such cases set forth in section 702,015(5), Florida Statutes (2015). It also incorporates the requirements of section 673.3091 (Enforcement of lost, destroyed, or stolen instrument). In response to the comments filed with regard to form 1.944(b), the Committee has proposed several amendments. The Committee has also recommended several other amendments' for consistency between forms 1.944(a) and (b). Consistency between these forms is desirable, given that they are both mortgage foreclosure complaint forms intended to implement- the applicable statute. We adopt the amendments as proposed by the Committee.

Form 1.944(c) (Motion for Order to Show Cause) and Form 1.944(d) (Order to Show Cause). Form 1.944(c) is a motion for an order to show cause for entry of final judgment, of foreclosure. Form 1.944(d) 4s an order to show cause to .be issued following the filing of the motion for an order to show cause. These forms are meant to be used in proceedings under section 702.10, Florida Statutes (2015). The. Committee agrees with comments filed suggesting , that paragraph 7 of form 1.944(c) and paragraph 10 of form 1.944(d), referring to homestead status, should be deleted. - We adopt the- amendments to form 1.944(c) and (d) as proposed by the Committee In response to the comments.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and forms are hereby amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. 1 New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ober v. Town of Lauderdale-By-The-Sea
218 So. 3d 952 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 So. 3d 999, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 68, 2016 WL 164134, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-of-civil-procedure-fla-2016.