In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 31, 2023·No. SC2023-0033·Published

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2023-0033 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE.

August 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for the consideration of

proposed amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). We have

jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar’s Appellate Court Rules Committee filed a

report proposing amendments to rules 9.030 (Jurisdiction of

Courts), 9.040 (General Provisions), 9.100 (Original Proceedings),

9.110 (Appeal Proceedings to Review Final Orders of Lower

Tribunals and Orders Granting New Trial in Jury and Nonjury

Cases), 9.120 (Discretionary Proceedings to Review Decisions of

District Courts of Appeal), 9.130 (Proceedings to Review Nonfinal

Orders and Specified Final Orders), 9.160 (Discretionary Proceedings to Review Decisions of County Courts), 9.170 (Appeal

Proceedings in Probate and Guardianship Cases), 9.360 (Parties),

and 9.430 (Proceedings by Indigents). Both the Committee and the

Board of Governors of The Florida Bar approved the proposed

amendments. The Committee published its proposals for comment

before filing its report with the Court. No comments were received

by the Committee, and no comments were received by the Court

following publication by the Court in the March 1, 2023, edition of

The Florida Bar News.

After considering the Committee’s proposals, we adopt the

Committee’s amendments as proposed, except for the proposed

amendments to rules 9.030(a)(1), 9.030(b)(1), and 9.030(c)(1), which

we decline to adopt, and to rule 9.360(a), which we adopt with

modifications. We discuss the rule amendments below.

In general, revisions are made throughout the subject rules to

simplify language consistent with In re Guidelines for Rules

Submissions, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC22-78 (Fla. Oct. 24,

2022). Such changes include updating “shall” to “must” or “will,”

updating “prior to” to “before,” and updating “pursuant to” to

“under.” We decline to adopt these proposed changes only for -2- subdivisons (a)(1), (b)(1), and (c)(1) of rule 9.030, because doing so

would create conflict between the text of these rules and the Florida

Constitution. 1

In addition, to maintain consistency, we amend the rules

where applicable with these terms: “clerk of the circuit court” is

used where the circuit court is the lower tribunal; “clerk of the

district court of appeal” is used where the district court of appeal is

the lower tribunal; “clerk of the lower tribunal” is used where the

lower tribunal could be the county court, circuit court, an

administrative agency, or even the district court of appeal; and

“clerk of the court” is used where the clerk being referenced is the

clerk of the appellate court. And also where applicable, the rules

are amended to remove language providing that an appellate court’s

jurisdiction must be invoked by filing the notice with “any filing fees

1. The Committee’s proposal recommends changing “shall” to “must” in these three subdivisions. But article V of the Florida Constitution uses “shall” instead of “must” when setting out the mandatory appellate jurisdiction of Florida courts. See art. V, §§ 3(b)(1)-(2), 4(b)(1)-(2), 5(b), Fla. Const. In this circumstance, and those like it that may arise in the future, the text of a procedural rule should match the constitutional text, even if our Guidelines suggest otherwise.

-3- prescribed by law, with the clerk of the lower tribunal,” because, as

clarified in rule 9.040, filing fee defects are not jurisdictional.

Subdivision (b)(4) of rule 9.030 is amended to conform with

section 34.017(1), Florida Statutes, to clarify that district courts of

appeal, in their discretion, may review by appeal final county court

orders, otherwise appealable to the circuit court, when the county

court certifies that the order may involve a question of statewide

application, which is either of great public importance or will affect

the uniform administration of justice. Comparable changes are also

made to rule 9.160.

Next, subdivision (e) of rule 9.130 is amended to correct a

discrepancy between the filing deadlines for serving the initial brief

in a nonfinal appeal and the deadline for serving a notice of intent

to cross-appeal. Under the current rule, effective in 2019, both

deadlines fall on the same day: fifteen days after the filing of the

notice of appeal. Subdivision (e) is amended to add back the five-

day buffer that was previously built in before subdivision (g) was

amended to increase from ten to fifteen days the deadline for

appellees to serve the notice of intent to cross-appeal following

-4- service of the notice of appeal. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules of

Civ. Proc., 257 So. 3d 66, 69 (Fla. 2018).

Lastly, with modification to the Committee’s proposal, we

amend rule 9.360. In subdivision (a), we clarify that a notice of

joinder for realignment must be filed in the appellate court by

adding the phrase “in the appellate court” to the provision. This

clarification should eliminate a party’s need to cross-reference other

rules to determine in which court a party needs to file a notice of

joinder.

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure are

amended as reflected in the appendix to this opinion. New

language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by

struck-through type. The amendments will become effective on

January 1, 2024, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure

-5- Elaine D. Walter, Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Miami, Florida, Hon. Andrew D. Manko, Past Chair, Appellate Court Rules Committee, Tallahassee, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Heather Savage Telfer, Bar Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-6- APPENDIX

RULE 9.030. JURISDICTION OF COURTS

(a) [No changes]

(b) Jurisdiction of District Courts of Appeal.

(1)-(3) [No changes]

(4) Discretionary Review.10 District courts of appeal, in their discretion, may review by appeal final orders of the county court, otherwise appealable to the circuit court by general law, that the county court has certified to beinvolve a question that may have statewide application and that:

(A) is of great public importance; or

(B) will affect the uniform administration of justice.

(c) [No changes]

Committee Notes [No changes]

RULE 9.040. GENERAL PROVISIONS

(a) Complete Determination. In all proceedings a court shallwill have such jurisdiction as may be necessary for a complete determination of the cause.

(b) Forum.

-7- (1) If a proceeding is commenced in an inappropriate court, that court shallwill transfer the cause to an appropriate court.

(2) After a lower tribunal renders an order transferring venue, the appropriate court to review otherwise reviewable nonfinal orders is as follows:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, (Fla. 2023).

In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related