In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 31, 2015
DocketSC14-1055
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion, (Fla. 2015).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC14-1055 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFICATION AND REGULATION OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE COURT INTERPRETERS.

[March 31, 2015] REVISED OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Court Interpreter Certification Board (Board) asks the Court to adopt

amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken

Language Court Interpreters (Court Interpreter Rules). We have jurisdiction. See

art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

This Court has charged the Board with the responsibility to continuously

study the court system’s interpreting services program and to consider and propose

program changes to improve the provision of court interpreting services. Under

Court Interpreter Rule 14.110(f)(5), the Board has authority to make

recommendations to the Court on language access issues and to recommend amendments to court rules relating to court interpreting services. With the minor

exceptions discussed below, we adopt the amendments as proposed.

In March 2014, this Court adopted amendments to the Court Interpreter

Rules. See In re Amends. to Fla. Rules for Certif. & Regul. of Court Interprtrs.,

136 So. 3d 584 (Fla. 2014). With those amendments, we established and set the

qualifications for the three “designations” of court interpreters: certified, language-

skilled, and provisionally approved. The amendments also subjected undesignated

interpreters working in the courts by court appointment on a regular or recurring

basis to the court interpreters’ Code of Professional Conduct and, to a limited

extent, to the disciplinary procedures for designated court interpreters.

The amendments we adopt today include a definition of the term “court

interpreter” that is more inclusive than previously understood. “Court interpreter”

is defined to include all persons providing spoken language interpreting services in

all court and court-related proceedings, except those providing services without

pay to indigent persons when court appointment is not required. We also adopt a

definition of “court-related proceeding” that will make clear that the provision of

high-quality court interpreting services is intended to include not only proceedings

presided over by a judge, magistrate, or hearing officer but also ancillary activities

such as depositions, mediations, and other similar proceedings. The purpose of

-2- these amendments is to broaden the application of the Court Interpreter Rules and

to elevate the quality of court interpreter services throughout the court system.

The new rules require all court interpreters, as newly defined, to register

with the Office of the State Courts Administrator. The act of registration will now

be an interpreter’s first step toward becoming a designated interpreter. After an

individual registers, the rules require the registrant to make progress toward

achieving designation by undertaking the required qualifying steps with respect to

training, experience, and testing. Other changes are made throughout the rules to

coordinate existing provisions with the new registration requirement.

Under the amendments we adopt today, the Code of Professional Conduct

and disciplinary rules will apply to all court interpreters, as newly defined, working

in the court system.

The amended rules will apply the standards of the court interpreter

certification program more broadly throughout the court system. Current rule

14.205, Certified Court Interpreter Designation, provides that certified interpreters

are given preference in court appointments, contracts for interpreter services, and

interpreter staff hiring decisions. Rule 14.215, Language Skilled Designation,

provides that language-skilled interpreters are given preference in court

appointments. Amended rules 14.205 and 14.210 (current rule 14.215 is

renumbered as 14.210) extend the preference for certified and language-skilled

-3- interpreters to “selection, appointment, staffing, [and] private retention of court

interpreters.” These changes are intended to promote the use of more highly

qualified interpreters when interpreters are privately retained as well as when they

are court-appointed.

As part of a reorganization that changes the order in which various

provisions will appear in the body of rules, current rule 14.210, Waiver of

Examination Requirement, is renumbered as rule 14.220. Current rule 14.210(b)

provides: “Upon presentation of proof satisfactory to the board, the examination

requirement shall be waived for anyone who has passed an equivalent examination

in another state, if in accordance with board-approved requisites.” As proposed for

inclusion in subdivision (b) of new rule 14.220, this sentence reads: “Upon

presentation of proof satisfactory to the board, the examination requirement shall

be waived for anyone who has taken an equivalent examination in another state

and meets minimum qualifying board-approved requisites.” We do not agree that

the words “has passed an equivalent examination” should be changed to read “has

taken an equivalent examination.” We retain the words “has passed” in adopting

new rule 14.220(b). Also, we change the heading of subdivision (b) from

“Reciprocity” to “Equivalent Examination” to more accurately describe the content

of the subdivision.

-4- In addition to the matters discussed above, the amendments include changes

in the organization of the rules and changes to coordinate the various new

provisions with the existing rules and to make terminology consistent.

We thank the members of the Court Interpreter Certification Board for their

service in preparing these rule amendments for our consideration. We adopt the

rule amendments shown in the appendix to this opinion. New language is

indicated by underlining. Deleted language is shown in struck-through type. All

of the amendments will take effect at 12:01 a.m. on April 1, 2015, except for

amended rules 14.200(a), 14.205(b)(1), 14.210(b)(1), and 14.215(a)(1). The latter

amendments will take effect at 12:01 a.m. on October 1, 2015.

It is so ordered.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Original Proceedings – Court Interpreter Certification Board Committee

Judge Jon Kevin Abdoney, Chair, Court Interpreter Certification Board, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, Florida, and Judge William Elbridge Davis, Past Chair, Court Interpreter Certification Board, Eighth Judicial Circuit, Gainesville, Florida; and James Calvin Goodlett, Staff Liaison, Office of the State Courts Administrator, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-5- Kathleen Regina Pugh, Trial Court Administrator, Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Fort Lauderdale, Florida,

Responding with comments

-6- APPENDIX

FLORIDA RULES FOR CERTIFICATION AND REGULATION OF SPOKEN LANGUAGE COURT INTERPRETERS PART I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

Rule 14.100. Definitions

The following terms have the meanings shown as used in these rules: (a) Court Interpreter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Rules for Certification and Regulation of Spoken Language Court Interpreters - Revised Opinion, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-rules-for-certific-fla-2015.