In Re: Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules - 2019 Regular-Cycle Report

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 14, 2019
DocketSC19-164
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules - 2019 Regular-Cycle Report (In Re: Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules - 2019 Regular-Cycle Report) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules - 2019 Regular-Cycle Report, (Fla. 2019).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC19-164 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA PROBATE RULES - 2019 REGULAR-CYCLE REPORT.

November 14, 2019

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the regular-cycle report of proposed amendments

to the Florida Probate Rules (Rules), filed by the Florida Probate Rules Committee

(Committee). See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(b). We have jurisdiction. See art. V,

§ 2(a), Fla. Const.

BACKGROUND

The Committee proposes amendments to rules 5.020 (Pleadings;

Verification; Motions), 5.040 (Notice), 5.200 (Petition for Administration), 5.240

(Notice of Administration), 5.241 (Notice to Creditors), 5.275 (Burden of Proof in

Will Contests), 5.320 (Oath of Personal Representative), 5.360 (Elective Share),

5.407 (Proceedings to Determine Family Allowance), 5.470 (Ancillary

Administration), 5.490 (Form and Manner of Presenting Claim), 5.499 (Form and

Manner of Objecting to Personal Representative’s Proof of Claim), 5.636 (Settlement of Minors’ Claims), 5.649 (Guardian Advocate), 5.681 (Restoration of

Rights of Person with Developmental Disability), 5.695 (Annual Guardianship

Report), and 5.900 (Expedited Judicial Intervention Concerning Medical

Treatment Procedures). The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar unanimously

approved the proposals.

The Committee published the proposals in The Florida Bar News before

filing them with the Court. No comments were received by the Committee.

Following publication, for efficiency, the Committee decided to include

amendments to two additional rules, which were published in a later edition of The

Florida Bar News. After the Committee’s report was filed, the Court published the

amendments for comment. The Court received no comments.

We have fully considered the Committee’s proposed amendments. As

discussed in this opinion, we adopt the amendments as proposed, with three

exceptions: (1) we have revised the Committee’s proposal to amend rule 5.040

(Notice); (2) we have revised the Committee’s proposal to amend rule 5.636

(Settlement of Minors’ Claims); and (3) we have not adopted the proposed

amendment to rule 5.499 (Form and Manner of Objecting to Personal

Representative’s Proof of Claim) that would have removed the timeframe within

which an objection is to be served on a claimant. The Committee explained that it

was removing the service deadline because that deadline is not contained within

-2- section 733.705, Florida Statutes. That statute sets forth the deadline for filing an

objection to a claim and then provides that “the person filing it shall serve a copy

of the objection as provided by the Florida Probate Rules.” § 733.705(2), Fla. Stat.

(2019). We see no reason why an appropriate timeframe for service should not be

set forth in the governing procedural rule. Providing an appropriate time for

service of legal documents is consistent with notions of procedural due process and

the efficient administration of justice.

We discuss the more significant amendments to the Probate Rules below.

AMENDMENTS

The amendment to rule 5.020 (Pleadings; Verification; Motions) changes the

deadline for service of a motion for rehearing from 10 days to 15 days after the

date of filing of the order or judgment.

New subdivision (a)(3)(D) is added to rule 5.040 (Notice). This new

subdivision provides for service by first-class mail when only in rem or quasi in

rem relief is sought under certain circumstances. However, we have revised the

Committee’s proposal to include the phrase “where authorized by the Florida Trust

Code” after the phrase “by first-class mail” because it appears that service by first-

class mail when in rem or quasi in rem relief is sought is authorized by the Florida

Trust Code but not the Florida Probate Code. Additionally, we revised subdivision

(a)(4)(F) by deleting the phrase “at its registered office in Florida or its principal

-3- business office in Florida or, if neither is known after reasonable inquiry, at its last

known address” and in its place, adding the phrase “as provided in chapter 48,

Florida Statutes.” Also, we revised subdivision (a)(5) to include completion of

service under subdivisions (a)(3)(B) and (C).

Rule 5.200 (Petition for Administration), is amended, as proposed, to require

the person seeking appointment as the personal representative to indicate whether

any other person has equal or higher preference under section 733.301, Florida

Statutes, and if so, the person’s name and whether the person will be served with

formal notice. Additionally, the rule is amended to add a new subdivision (k) to

require a statement that the personal representative is qualified to serve under the

laws of Florida as a business entity under section 733.305, Florida Statutes, or as

an individual under sections 733.303 and 733.304, Florida Statutes.

Rule 5.275 (Burden of Proof in Will Contests) is amended to correspond to

legislative changes in section 733.107, Florida Statutes. Specifically, we add a

new subdivision (b), which states that where the presumption of undue influence

applies, the presumption shifts the burden of proof under sections 90.301-90.304,

Florida Statutes.

Finally, rule 5.636 (Settlement of Minors’ Claims) is amended as the

Committee proposes by adding the phrase “equals or” before the phrase “exceeds

-4- $50,000” in subdivisions (d) and (e). Additionally, we have added the phrase

“equal or” before the phrase “exceed $50,000” in subdivision (e).

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, we amend the Florida Probate Rules as reflected in the

appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring, and

deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The committee notes are offered

for explanation only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The

amendments shall become effective January 1, 2020, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, LAGOA, LUCK, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – The Florida Probate Rules Committee

Jeffrey Scott Goethe, Chair, Florida Probate Rules Committee, Bradenton, Florida, and Theodore Stanley Kypreos, Past Co-Chair, Florida Probate Rules Committee, West Palm Beach, Florida, Cristina Papanikos, Past Co-Chair, Florida Probate Rules Committee, Miami, Florida; and Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, and Heather Savage Telfer, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-5- APPENDIX

RULE 5.020. PLEADINGS; VERIFICATION; MOTIONS

(a) – (c) [No Change]

(d) Rehearing. A motion for rehearing of any order or judgment shall be served not later than 1015 days after the date of filing the order or judgment with the clerk as shown on the face of the order or judgment.

(e) [No Change]

Committee Notes The time for determining when a motion for rehearing must be served has been clarified in view of Casto v. CastoCasto v. Casto, 404 So. 2d 1046 (Fla. 1981).

Rule History

1977 Revision – 2010 Revision [No Change]

2019 Revision: Subdivision (d) amended to change the deadline for service of a motion for rehearing from 10 to 15 days after the specified event to conform to 2013 amendments to the Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.530.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Guardianship of Browning
568 So. 2d 4 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Cason Ex Rel. Saferight v. Hammock
908 So. 2d 512 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Casto v. Casto
404 So. 2d 1046 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to the Florida Probate Rules - 2019 Regular-Cycle Report, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-probate-rules-2019-regular-cycle-report-fla-2019.