In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure

783 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 965, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2276, 2000 WL 1535306
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2000
DocketNo. SC00-345
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 783 So. 2d 937 (In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, 783 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 965, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2276, 2000 WL 1535306 (Fla. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Family Law Rules Committee (“the rules committee”) has submitted to this Court its quadrennial report of proposed amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.130(c).

The rules committee proposes changes to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure 12.140, 12.405, 12.490, 12.560, and 12.610, and Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form's 12.910(a), 12.930(b), and 12.930(c). The proposals were submitted to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar, which recommends approval of all the proposals. The committee’s proposals were published for comment and two comments were filed.

After considering the comments and hearing oral argument, we adopt many of the committee’s proposals. The amendments as adopted are summarized below, but technical changes are not discussed. The changes made to the committee’s proposals are discussed where appropriate.

Rule 12.140 (“Defenses”) currently reads in full that “[djefenses shall be governed by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.140.” The rules committee proposes adding the following language to the end of this rule:

However, a hearing is required for all matters included in rule 12.010(a)(1),[ 1] other than amended or supplementary matters, except when one -of the parties has died and the other party has admitted the marriage is irretrievably broken or filed a counterpetition asserting that the marriage is irretrievably broken.

(Footnote added.) In proposing this amendment, the rules committee seeks in part to comport with section 61.052(2), Florida Statutes (1999), insofar as that statute contemplates court action in dissolution of marriage cases “[biased on the evidence at the hearing.”2 Significantly, [938]*938however, as drafted, the proposed amendment extends far beyond the dissolution of marriage context to embrace “all matters included in rule 12.010(a)(1),” which in turn “applies] to all actions concerning family matters, including actions concerning domestic and repeat violence.” We are concerned that, if adopted, the proposed amendment would be misconstrued as requiring hearings in such actions even when perhaps uncalled for or unnecessary. While the committee is apparently concerned about hearings sometimes not being held in dissolution of marriage cases, we reject as too strong its proposed antidote to cure this perceived ill.

The committee through this proposed amendment also seeks in part to comport with this Court’s decision in Fernandez v. Fernandez, 648 So.2d 712 (Fla.1995), which involved the death of a party in a dissolution of marriage proceeding. However, we find the proposed amendment to be at odds with Fernandez, as well as with this Court’s more recent decision in Gaines v. Sayne, 764 So.2d 578 (Fla.2000), which also involved the death of a party in a dissolution of marriage proceeding.

We accordingly reject the rules committee’s proposed amendment to rule 12.140. We similarly reject alternative language that the Family Court Steering Committee proposed “[t]o improve readability and content,” as that proposed alternative language does not solve the larger concerns discussed above.

The rules committee proposes adopting new rule 12.405 (“Record of Ex Parte Proceedings”) to read in full as follows:

When ex parte hearings are authorized by statute or rule, all such hearings and proceedings in family law matters as defined in rule 12.010(a)(1), shall be reported stenographically or recorded electronically. Costs initially shall be borne by the party bringing the matter before the court, subject to later assessment of court costs. If the hearing is reported stenographically, the name, address, and telephone number of the court reporter shall be filed with the court on the date of the hearing. If recorded, the recording shall be filed with the court on the date of the hearing.

Attorney Doris I. Sanders filed a comment expressing several practical concerns about this proposed new rule, and we have some of our own. For example, fiscally [939]*939speaking, we are reluctant to adopt any rule that might discourage pro se petitioners from seeking needed protection from domestic violence based on their perception that pursuing such relief would be prohibitively costly. Moreover, logistically speaking, we are concerned that this proposed new rule might unreasonably require family law attorneys to always have court reporters accompany them to the courthouse just in case a hearing without notice is called by a judge. We are also somewhat concerned about the use of the term “ex parte” in the proposed new rule,3 and the fact that the mere existence of such an “ex parte” rule might in and of itself encourage inappropriate ex parte communications between judges and litigants.

We recognize that, as urged by the committee, “[t]he purpose of this [proposed new] rule is to avoid the appearance of impropriety, uphold the integrity of the judicial system by ensuring that these hearings are recorded, and protect the rights of nonattending parties and other participants.” However, we note that these concerns are not at all unique to family law, but rather apply across the board to all sorts of civil and criminal proceedings. We accordingly decline at this time to adopt the rules committee’s proposed new rule 12.405, but invite the committee, along with the Civil Procedure Rules Committee, the Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, the Workers’ Compensation Rules Committee, and any other interested rules committee to collectively consider this very important matter.

In rule 12.490 (“General Masters”), the rules committee proposes no changes to the rule itself, but rather proposes adding new commentary after the rule. We reject this proposed new commentary without discussion.

Rule 12.560 (“Discovery in Aid of Execution”) is amended to explicitly incorporate most of the text of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.560, but with modifications reflecting special considerations in family law cases.

In rule 12.610 (“Injunctions For Domestic And Repeat Violence”), subdivision (c)(1)(A) regarding temporary injunctions is amended to conform to statutory language and to provide that if a verified petition and affidavit are amended, the court shall consider the amendments as if originally filed.

In form 12.910(a) (“Summons: Personal Service on an Individual”), an unnecessary blank line has been omitted.

Forms 12.930(b) and (c) (“Standard Family Law Interrogatories”) are amended to ask that a legal description of real property be provided if the property does not have a street address so that the property may be identified correctly.

We accordingly approve the committee’s proposals with some modification as discussed above and set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions by strike-through type. The committee notes are offered for explanation only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 2001, at 12:01 a.m. See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.130(c)(5). Our thanks to the rules committee, as well as to the steering committee and attorney Sanders, for their insights and commitment to bettering the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure.

It is so ordered.

[940]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. State
827 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
783 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 965, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2276, 2000 WL 1535306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-the-florida-family-law-rules-of-procedure-fla-2000.