In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Miscellaneous

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 2023
DocketSC22-1292
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Miscellaneous (In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Miscellaneous) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Miscellaneous, (Fla. 2023).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC22-1292 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR—MISCELLANEOUS.

March 16, 2023

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is a petition of The Florida Bar (Bar)

proposing amendments to seventeen Rules Regulating The Florida

Bar (Bar Rules) and one bylaw. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, §

15, Fla. Const.; see also R. Regulating Fla. Bar 1-12.1.

The Bar proposes amending Bar Rules 1-3.5 (Retirement),

1-3.7 (Reinstatement to Membership), Bylaw 2-9.7 (Insurance for

Members of Board of Governors, Officers, Grievance Committee

Members, UPL Committee Members, Clients’ Security Fund

Committee Members, and Employees), 4-1.6 (Confidentiality of

Information), 4-3.8 (Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor), 5-1.1

(Trust Accounts), 11-1.1 (Purpose), 11-1.2 (Activities), 11-1.3

(Requirements and Limitations), 11-1.4 (Certification of Student), 11-1.5 (Approval of Legal Aid Organization), 11-1.6 (Other

Activities), 11-1.7 (Supervision), 11-1.8 (Miscellaneous), 11-1.9

(Continuation of Practice Program After Completion of Law School

Program or Graduation), 11-1.10 (Certification of Members of Out-

of-State Bars), 19-1.5 (Relationship to the Supreme Court

Commission on Professionalism), and 20-5.1 (Generally).

The Bar’s proposals were approved by the Board of Governors

of The Florida Bar, and consistent with Bar Rule 1-12.1(g), the Bar

published formal notice of the proposed amendments in The Florida

Bar News. The notice directed interested parties to file comments

directly with the Court. No comments were received. Having

considered the Bar’s petition, the Court hereby amends the Bar

Rules as proposed, except for the proposed technical amendment to

rule 5-1.1(g)(3) and the proposed amendment to rule 5-1.1(g)(5)(B)

requiring a minimum net interest rate of 25 basis points. The more

significant amendments are discussed below.

First, rule 1-3.5 is reorganized and new subdivision (b)

(Practice of Law Prohibited) is added to explain requirements for

retired members of the Bar. Specifically, retired members must not

practice law in Florida unless reinstated to active membership in -2- good standing or certified as an emeritus lawyer, must affirmatively

represent their retired status, and must not hold themselves out as

being able to practice law in Florida or render advice on matters of

Florida law unless certified as an emeritus lawyer. Also, new

language clarifying the requirements for retired members to be

reinstated to active membership is added to new subdivision (c)

(Reinstatement).

Next, in rule 1-3.7, subdivision (f) (Members Delinquent 60

Days or Less) is amended to treat a failure to file a trust account

compliance certification as an administrative delinquency.

Additionally, language stating that the effective date of

reinstatement relates back to the date of delinquency is replaced

with language providing that a lawyer is not considered in violation

of the Bar Rules if an administrative delinquency is cleared within

60 days.

In bylaw 2-9.7, “current and former” is added to clarify that

current and former officers of the Bar; members of the board of

governors, UPL, clients’ security fund, and grievance committees;

and employees of the Bar will be covered by insurance and

-3- indemnification for actions taken while acting on behalf of the Bar

in their official capacity.

Next, in rule 4-1.6, subdivision (b)(2), regarding when a lawyer

must reveal information, is amended to make clear that confidential

information must be disclosed to prevent death or substantial

bodily harm to anyone, including a client. Additionally, a new

subdivision (c)(7) is added to rule 4-1.6 to permit a lawyer to reveal

confidential information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes

necessary to “respond to specific allegations published via the

internet by a former client (e.g. a negative online review) that the

lawyer has engaged in criminal conduct punishable by law.”

Also, in rule 5-1.1, subdivision (g)(1)(E) is amended to expand

the definition of an interest or dividend-bearing trust account to

include a business or consumer deposit account, and in subdivision

(g)(5)(A), language is added that requires eligible institutions to

maintain IOTA accounts that pay the highest interest rate or

dividend generally available from the institution to its non-IOTA

business or consumer account customers, or its non-maturing

deposit account customers when IOTA accounts meet or exceed the

same minimum balance qualifications. And, in subdivision (g)(5)(B), -4- language is added requiring eligible institutions to tie interest rates

for IOTA accounts to specific indexed rate points.

In rule 11-1.2, subdivision (f) regarding the determination of

indigency is deleted, as lawyers can look to the statutes and other

sources for guidance on indigency rather than having the Board of

Governors set the standards.

Rule 11-1.8, which pertains to the rule chapter’s lack of effect

on the unlicensed practice of law, is deleted, and rules 11-1.9 and

11-1.10 are renumbered as 11-1.8 and 11-1.9.

Next, rule 19-1.5 is deleted, as the Supreme Court

Commission on Professionalism and Civility was disbanded in In re

Florida Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism and Civility,

Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-12 (Mar. 12, 2019).

Last, a new subdivision (h) is added to rule 20-5.1 to make

ineligible for the Florida Registered Paralegal Program persons who

have “engage[d] in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or

misrepresentation in the application or reapplication process,”

which will allow the Florida Registered Paralegal Compliance

Committee to deem someone unfit after a thorough investigation

has been conducted as to whether an applicant possesses the -5- professional standard or integrity expected of a Florida Registered

Paralegal during the application or reapplication process.

Accordingly, the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar are

amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language

is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-

through type. The amendments shall become effective May 15,

2023, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, POLSTON, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules Regulating The Florida Bar

Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, Gary S. Lesser, President, F. Scott Westheimer, President-elect, and Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, Division Director, Lawyer Regulation, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-6- APPENDIX

RULE 1-3.5 RETIREMENT

(a) Eligibility. Any member of The Florida Bar may retire from The Florida Bar upon petition or other written request to, and approval of, the executive director.

(b) Practice of Law Prohibited.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to Rules Regulating The Florida Bar – Miscellaneous, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-rules-regulating-the-florida-bar-miscellaneous-fla-2023.