In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar

978 So. 2d 91, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 14, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2392, 2007 WL 4440381
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 20, 2007
DocketSC06-736
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 978 So. 2d 91 (In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating the Fla. Bar, 978 So. 2d 91, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 14, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2392, 2007 WL 4440381 (Fla. 2007).

Opinion

978 So.2d 91 (2007)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. SC06-736.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 20, 2007.
Rehearing Denied March 19, 2008.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Francisco R. Angones, President, and Paul F. Hill, General Counsel, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, for Petitioner.

William Sumner Scott, J.D., Executive Director, Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc., on behalf of Judicial Equality Foundation, Inc.; and Pamela D. Cichon, Chair, Government Lawyer Section (2005-2006), Senior Assistant City Attorney, City of St. Petersburg, St. Petersburg, FL, and Keith W. Rizzardi, Chair, Government Lawyer Section (2003-2004), Trial Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Responding with comments.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar petitions this Court to consider proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, 15, Fla. Const.

The Florida Bar submitted several proposals to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation. The Board approved the proposals. Thereafter, the proposals were published for comment in the March 15, 2006, edition of The Florida Bar News. In that publication, the Bar instructed interested parties to file any comments directly with the Court. On April 26, 2006, the Bar filed the proposals with the Court. Only one comment, from the Judicial Equality Foundation, was filed with the Court regarding these proposals.

The Bar proposes amendments to rules 1-7.3 (Membership Fees); 3-2.1 (Generally); 3-5.1 (Generally); 3-6.1 (Generally); 3-7.5 (Procedures Before the Board of Governors); 3-7.6 (Procedures Before a Referee)[1]; 3-7.11 (General Rules of Procedure); 3-7.16 (Limitation on Time to Bring Complaint); 4-1.5 (Fees and Costs for Legal Services); 4-6.5 (Voluntary Pro Bono Plan); 5-1.1 (Trust Accounts); 6-1.2 (Public Notice); 10-2.1 (Generally); 10-3.1 (Generally); 10-4.1 (Generally); 10-7.2 (Proceedings for Indirect Criminal Contempt); 14-2.1 (Generally); 14-6 (Nature; Enforcement of Award; Effect of Failure to Pay); 14-6.1 (Binding Nature; Enforcement; and Effect of Failure to Pay Award); 17-1.2 (Definitions); and 17-1.3 (Activities). The Bar also proposes new rule 1-12.2 (Supreme Court Procedures for Review of Proposed Amendments) and amendments to Bylaw 2-7.3 (Creation of Sections and Divisions).

After considering the Bar's petition and the comment, the Court adopts The Florida Bar's proposals, except as follows.

The Bar proposes new rule 1-12.2 (Supreme Court Procedures for Review of Proposed Amendments), which would provide a court "conference and dialogue" process, rather than a "case and controversy" format, as an option for this Court to consider amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. The Bar asserts that the formality of oral argument, as the exclusive means for considering bar rule amendments, could be occasionally replaced *92 with an informal "dialogue" among Justices, proponents, commentators, and other interested parties. The Bar argues that the "conference and dialogue" approach could be beneficial in addressing changes to the Bar rules, due to the variety of matters that the Bar presents to the Court.

This proposal would provide the Court with an alternative to existing Bar rulemaking procedures. However, the proposal raises several issues that must be studied before implementing such a procedure. Therefore, the Court does not adopt the proposal at this time. Because the proposal presents significant unaddressed issues, the Court requests that the Bar undertake and submit a study addressing how, in states where the high courts have procedural rule or Bar rulemaking authority, those courts process their rule amendments. The report should also address the issue of ex parte communication with regard to communications among the Justices, proponents, and commentators. See Code of Judicial Conduct Canon 3(B)(7); Rose v. State, 601 So.2d 1181, 1183 (Fla. 1992); In re Clayton, 504 So.2d 394, 395 (Fla.1987). In preparing the report, the Bar is directed to work with the Rules of Judicial Administration Committee.

Accordingly, the Court adopts the amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by struck-through type, and new language is indicated by underscoring. The amendments shall become effective on March 1, 2008, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

LEWIS, C.J., concurs in part and dissents in part with an opinion.

LEWIS, C.J., concurring in part and dissenting in part.

Although I agree with most of the new amendments, I dissent with regard to the cumulative and deceptive designation termed "expert." For a thorough explanation of my disagreement, refer to my concurring-in-part-and-dissenting-in-part opinion in In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar—Advertising, 971 So.2d 763 (Fla.2007).

APPENDIX

RULE 1-7.3 MEMBERSHIP FEES

(a)-(e) [No Change]

(f) Membership Fees Exemption for Activated Reserve Members of the Armed Services. Members of The Florida Bar engaged in reserve military service in the Armed Forces of the United States who are called to active duty for 30 days or more during the bar's fiscal year shall be exempt from the payment of membership fees required under this rule. For purposes of this rule, the Armed Forces of the United States includes the United States Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, Coast Guard, as well as the Army National Guard, Army Reserve, Navy Reserve, Marine Corps Reserve, the Air National Guard of the United States, the Air Force Reserve, and the Coast Guard Reserve. Requests for an exemption shall be made within 15 days before the date that membership fees are due each year or within 15 days of activation to duty of a reserve member. To the extent membership fees were paid despite qualifying for this exemption, such membership fee shall be reimbursed by The Florida Bar within 30 days of receipt of a member's request for exemption. Within 30 days of leaving active duty status, the member shall report to The Florida Bar that he or she is no *93 longer on active duty status in the United States Armed Forces.

BYLAW 2-7.3 CREATION OF SECTIONS AND DIVISIONS

Sections and divisions may be created or abolished by the board of governors as deemed necessary or desirable.

(a) Sections. The following sections of The Florida Bar have been created by the board of governors:

(a1) Administrative Law Section;
(b2) Appellate Practice Section;
(c3) Business Law Section;
(d4) City, County and Local Government Law Section;
(e5) Criminal Law Section;
(f6) Elder Law Section;
(g7) Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Section;
(h8) Environmental and Land Use Law Section;
(i9) Equal Opportunities Law Section;
(j10) Family Law Section;
(k11) General Practice, Solo and Small Firm Section;
(l12) Government Lawyer Section;
(m13) Health Law Section;
(n14) International Law Section;
(o15) Labor and Employment Law Section;
(p16) Practice Management and Development Section;
(q17) Public Interest Law Section;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Feldman v. Davis
53 So. 3d 1132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Florida Bar v. Doane
43 So. 3d 640 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)
In Re Amendments to Rules Reg. Bar-Advertising
971 So. 2d 763 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
978 So. 2d 91, 33 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 14, 2007 Fla. LEXIS 2392, 2007 WL 4440381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-rules-regulating-the-fla-bar-fla-2007.