In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating Fl Bar

916 So. 2d 655, 2005 WL 2456201
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedDecember 8, 2005
DocketSC05-206
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 916 So. 2d 655 (In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating Fl Bar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Rules Regulating Fl Bar, 916 So. 2d 655, 2005 WL 2456201 (Fla. 2005).

Opinion

916 So.2d 655 (2005)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES REGULATING THE FLORIDA BAR.

No. SC05-206.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 6, 2005.
As Revised on Denial of Rehearing December 8, 2005.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Paul Hill, General Counsel, John Anthony Boggs, Director of Lawyer Regulation, Lori S. Holcomb, Assistant UPL Counsel and Elizabeth C. Tarbert, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, FL, Gregory S. Parker, Perry, Florida, Honorable Ralph Artigliere, Circuit Court Judge, Bartow, FL, and Henry Matson Coxe, III of Bedell, Dittmar, Devault, et al., Jacksonville, FL, for Petitioner.

John A. Weiss, Richard B. Liss and Patricia S. Etkin of Weiss and Etkin, Tallahassee, FL, W. Hampton Keen, Joette S. Keen, Don Fountain, Gregory P. Huber, Gregory T. Zele and Joseph J. Reiter of Lytal, Reiter, Clark, Fountain and Williams, LLP, West Palm Beach, FL, and Hugh Nilsen Smith of Smith and Fuller, P.A., Belleair Bluffs, FL, for Opponents.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar petitions this Court to consider its proposed amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar. We have jurisdiction. See Art. V, ž 15, Fla. Const.

The Bar submitted the proposed amendments to the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation. The Board approved the proposals, except for certain minimal revisions submitted after the proposals were published for comment in the January 1, 2005, edition of The Florida Bar News.[1] In that publication, the Bar instructed interested parties to file any comments directly with the Court. Thereafter, the Bar filed its proposals with the Court.

The Bar proposes amendments to rules 1-3.5 (Retirement), 1-3.6 (Delinquent *656 Members), 1-3.8 (Right to Inventory), 1-7.3 (Membership Fees), 3-2.1 (Definitions, Generally), 3-3.4 (Grievance Committees), 3-5.1 (Types of Discipline, Generally), 3-6.1 (Employment of Certain Attorneys or Former Attorneys, Generally), 3-7.1 (Confidentiality), 3-7.4 (Grievance Committee Procedures), 3-7.6 (Procedures Before a Referee), 3-7.9 (Consent Judgment), 3-7.10 (Reinstatement and Readmission Procedures), 3-7.11 (General Rules of Procedure), 4-1.5 (Fees and Costs for Legal Services), 4-3.4 (Fairness to Opposing Party and Counsel), 4-5.4 (Professional Independence of a Lawyer), 4-7.7 (Evaluation of Advertisements), 4-8.1 (Bar Admission and Disciplinary Matters), 4-8.4 (Misconduct), 4-8.6 (Authorized Business Entities), 6-3.5 (Standards for Certification), 6-3.7 (Emeritus Specialist Status), 6-3.8 (Revocation of Certification), 10-2.1 (Definitions, Generally), 10-6.1 (Taking of Testimony), 10-6.2 (Subpoenas), 10-7.1 (Proceedings for Injunctive Relief), 10-7.2 (Proceedings for Indirect Criminal Contempt), and 10-8.1 (Files). The Bar proposes the addition of new rule 4-5.8 (Procedures for Lawyers Leaving Law Firms and Dissolution of Law Firms). Further, the Bar proposes the deletion of rule 3-7.12 (Disciplinary Resignation from the Florida Bar).[2]

After considering the relevant comments filed and holding oral argument on June 9, 2005, the Court adopts the Bar's proposals with a slight modification to the proposal for rule 3-7.6 (Procedures Before a Referee). As modified, the amendment changes a referee's duties but not a Bar counsel's duties. Thus, the Bar shall continue to make the record available.

The Court wishes to express its sincerest gratitude to The Florida Bar and its members who contributed to the development of these numerous proposals. The Court also thanks the individuals who filed comments, especially those who participated in oral argument.

Accordingly, the Court adopts the amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. Deletions are indicated by struck-through type, and new language is indicated by underscoring. The comments are included for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The amendments shall become effective on January 1, 2006, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 1-3.5 RETIREMENT

Any member of The Florida Bar may retire from The Florida Bar upon petition or other written request to, and approval of, the board of governorsexecutive director. A retired member shall not practice law in this state except upon petition for reinstatement to, and approval of, the board of governorsexecutive director; the payment of all membership fees, costs, or other amounts owed to The Florida Bar; and the completion of all outstanding continuing legal education or basic skills course requirements. A retired member shall be entitled to receive such other privileges *657 as the board of governors may authorize.

A retired member shall remain subject to disciplinary action for acts committed before the effective date of retirement. Acts committed after retirement may be considered in evaluating the member's fitness to resume the practice of law in Florida as elsewhere stated in these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar.

If the executive director is in doubt as to disposition of a petition, the executive director may refer the petition to the board of governors for its action. Action of the executive director or board of governors denying a petition for retirement or reinstatement hereunder may be reviewed upon petition to the Supreme Court of Florida.

RULE 1-3.6 DELINQUENT MEMBERS

Any person now or hereafter licensed to practice law in Florida whoshall be deemed a delinquent member if the member:

(a) fails to pay membership fees,;

(b) fails to comply with continuing legal education or basic skills course requirements, or;

(c) is delinquent in the payment offails to pay the costs assessed in diversion or disciplinary cases within 30 days after the disciplinary decision or diversion recommendation becomes final, unless such time is extended by the board of governors for good cause shown; or

(d) fails to make restitution imposed in diversion cases or disciplinary proceedings brought under these Rules Regulating The Florida Bar within the time specified in the order in such cases or proceedings, unless the time is extended by the board of governors for good cause shown;

(e) fails to pay fees imposed as part of diversion for more than 90 days after the diversion recommendation became final, unless such time is extended by the board of governors for good cause shown; or

(f) fails to pay an award entered in fee arbitration proceedings conducted under the authority stated elsewhere in these rules and 90 days or more have elapsed since the date on which the award became final, unless such time is extended by the board of governors for good cause shown. shall be deemed a delinquent member. While occupying the status of a dDelinquent members, no person shall not engage in the practice of law in Florida nor be entitled to any privileges and benefits accorded to members of The Florida Bar in good standing.

RULE 1-3.8 RIGHT TO INVENTORY

(a) Appointment; Grounds; Authority.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James Wesley Scott v. State of Mississippi
231 So. 3d 1024 (Court of Appeals of Mississippi, 2016)
Florida Bar v. Winters
104 So. 3d 299 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2012)
Chastain v. Cunningham Law Group, P.A.
16 So. 3d 203 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Florida Bar re Hochman
944 So. 2d 198 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)
Myers v. Siegel
920 So. 2d 1241 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
In re Amendments to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure Form 12.900(A)
920 So. 2d 1145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 So. 2d 655, 2005 WL 2456201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-rules-regulating-fl-bar-fla-2005.