In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF the SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO the BAR

191 So. 3d 885, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2016 WL 2908142, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1047
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 19, 2016
DocketSC15-1226
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 3d 885 (In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF the SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO the BAR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re AMENDMENTS TO RULES OF the SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO the BAR, 191 So. 3d 885, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2016 WL 2908142, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1047 (Fla. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This matter, is before the Court for consideration of amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar (Bar Admissions Rules) proposed by the Florida Board of Bar Examiners (Board). See Fla. Bar Admiss. R. 1-12. _ We have jurisdiction 1 and adopt the majority of the amendments as proposed. However, at this time, we reject, without prejudice, other proposed amendments as noted.

BACKGROUND

The Board filed a petition proposing amendments to Bar Admissions Rules 1-27 (Office Location); 2-30.2 (Filed with the Court); 3-10.1 (Essential Eligibility Requirements); 3-14.2 (Filed as a Registrant); 3-22.5 (Board Action Following an Investigative Hearing); 3-23.1 (Failure to File,-the Answer); 3-23.2 (Formal Hearing); .3-23.6 (Board Action Following Formal Hearing); ■ 3-30 (Petition for Board Reconsideration); 3-40.1 (Dissatisfied with Board’s Recommendation); 340.2 (Dissatisfied with Length of Board’s Investigation); 4-14 (Dates of Administration); 4-22 (Part A); 4-42.4 (Cutoff for Test Accommodations); 4-43.2 ($625); 4-51.1 (Possession or Use of Unauthorized Materials or Equipment); 451.2 (Receipt of Unauthorized Aid); 4-51.3 (Observance of Examination Start/Stop Announcements); 4-62.1 (Impoundment of Examination Results); and 4-62.2 (Release of Impounded Examination Results). The Court publish *886 ed the proposals for comment. No. comments were filed with the Court.

AMENDMENTS

.First, we reject at this time, without prejudice, the proposed amendments to rules 2-30.2 (Filed with the Court); 3-22.5 (Board Action Following an Investigative Hearing); 3-23.6 (Board Action Following Formal Hearing); 3-40.1 (Dissatisfied with Board’s Recommendation); and 3-40.2 (Dissatisfied with Length of Board’s Investigation). We decline to address those proposed amendments at this time.

A number of the proposed amendments to the Bar Admissions Rules we do adopt are technical or otherwise do not warrant discussion. The more significant amendments include the following changes.

Rule 3-10.1 (Essential Eligibility Requirements) is amended to clarify that applicants and registrants must demonstrate by their actions that they meet the Essential Eligibility Requirements for the practice of law. Also added to. this rule is a requirement that ’applicants and registrants must demonstrate that they will be able to avoid acts that exhibit a disregard for the rights,, safety, or welfare of others.

Rule 3-23.1 (Failure to File the Answer) is amended to provide that the failure to file an answer to Specifications constitutes a waiver of an applicant’s right to a formal hearing before the Board.

- Rule 3-30 (Petition for Board Reconsideration) is amended, as proposed, to provide that an applicant or registrant has 60 days from receipt of, as opposed to .the date of, the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation to file a petition for reconsideration. This change is consistent with the rule 3-40.1 60-day deadline for filing' a petition for- review of the Board’s recommendation in this Court. Language also is added to rule-3-30 to provide applicants with a better understanding of how a petition for reconsideration will be handled by the Board and to clarify the responsibilities of each party. This amendment provides that the Office of General Counsel may file a response to the petition to address whether it meets the threshold requirement of the rule that the petition. “contain[] new and material evidence that by due diligence could not have been produced at the formal hearing.” If the Board finds that the petition does not meet the threshold requirement, the Board will take no further action on the petition. If the Board determines the threshold requirement has been met, the Office of General Counsel will have 30 days to file a response to the evidence, and the applicant will have 30 days to file a reply. The amendment to rule 3-40.1 (Dissatisfied with Board’s Recommendation) provides that an applicant or registrant has 60 days from receipt of notice of the determination that a petition for reconsideration does not meet the rule 3-30 criteria for reconsideration to petition this Court for review.

Rule 4-22 (Part A) is amended to list by subject matter, rather than by rule number, the areas of the Rules of Judicial Administration that can be tested on Part A of the General Bar Examination. “Minimization of the filing of sensitive information” is added to the areas under the Rules of Judicial Administration that may be tested.

In order to ensure the Board can timely process all requests for accommodations, rule 4-42,4 (Cutoff for Test Accommodations) is amended to require requests for test accommodations be received by the Board by a certain deadline, rather than postmarked by a deadline.

The amendment to rule 4-43.2 ($625) changes the deadline, related to a late-filed application for the bar examination from when the application is postmarked to when the application is received by the *887 Board. This amendment is' intended to eliminate any ambiguity regarding an applicant’s admission to the bar examination.

Accordingly, we amend the -Rules of the Supreme Court Relating to Admissions to the Bar as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language, is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, POLSTON, and PERRY, JJ., concur. ,

APPENDIX

RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT RELATING TO ADMISSIONS TO THE BAR

⅛-2?1-26 Office Location. The office of the board will be maintained in Tallahassee, Florida.

3-10.1 Essential Eligibility Requirements. The board considers demonstration of the following attributes to -be essential for all applicants and registrants seeking admission to The Florida Bar:

(a)-(b) [No Change]
(c) ability to and the likelihood that, in the practice of law, one will:
(1) [Ño Change]
(2) [No Change]
(3) [No Change]
(4) avoid acts that exhibit disregard for the rights, safety, or welfare of others,
44X5) avoid acts that are illegal, dishonest, fraudulent, or deceitful; and,
4¾6) comply with the requirements of applicable state, local, and federal laws, rules, and regulations; any applicable order, of a court or tribunal; and the Rules of Professional Conduct.

3-14.2 Filed as a Registrant. A registrant is required to file a complete and sworn Registrant Bar Application. Transcripts required by this rule must be- sent directly to the board from the educational institutions. The application will not be deemed complete until all of the following items have been received by the board:

(a) [No Change]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 3d 885, 41 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 231, 2016 WL 2908142, 2016 Fla. LEXIS 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-rules-of-the-supreme-court-relating-to-admissions-to-fla-2016.