In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure

939 So. 2d 74, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2210, 2006 WL 2690230
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedSeptember 21, 2006
DocketSC06-140
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 939 So. 2d 74 (In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, 939 So. 2d 74, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2210, 2006 WL 2690230 (Fla. 2006).

Opinion

939 So.2d 74 (2006)

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA RULES OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE (THREE YEAR CYCLE).

No. SC06-140.

Supreme Court of Florida.

September 21, 2006.

Mary Katherine Wimsett, Chair, Gainesville, Florida, Alan Abramowitz, Past-Chair, Orlando, Florida, Juvenile Court Rules Committee, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Honorable Robert J. Jones, General Magistrate, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, Florida; Joyce Sibson Dove, Esquire, James V. Cook, Esquire, George Drumming, Esquire, Susan Barber, Esquire, Janet Schaffer, Esquire, Catherine Healey, Esquire, and Anne Marie Highsmith, Esquire, Members of the Parents Bar, Dependency Court, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida; Honorable Scott M. Kenney, Circuit Judge, Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Fort Pierce, Florida; Honorable George S. Reynolds, III, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Quincy, Florida, Honorable Nikki Ann Clark, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable Thomas H. Bateman, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable Jonathan Sjostrom, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable Janet E. Ferris, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable P. Kevin Davey, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable Kathleen Dekker, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable John E. Crusoe, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable James C. Hankinson, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable John C. Cooper, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Honorable Angela C. Dempsey, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, and Honorable Terry P. Lewis, Circuit Judge, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida; Honorable Thomas W. Lager, Magistrate, Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, Florida; Beth Englander, Director, Office of Family Safety, Department of Children and Families; and Dennis Moore, General Counsel, Statewide Guardian ad Litem Office, Tallahassee, Florida, Opponents, responding with comments.

PER CURIAM.

The Juvenile Court Rules Committee (Committee) petitions this Court to consider amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.130(c)(4).

BACKGROUND

The Committee, in its regular-cycle report, proposes amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure 8.045 (Notice to Appear); 8.090 (Speedy Trial); 8.135 (Correction of Disposition or Commitment Orders); 8.210 (Parties and Participants); 8.257 (General Magistrates); 8.350 (Placement of Child Into Residential Treatment Center After Adjudication of Dependency); 8.515 (Providing Counsel to Parties); and 8.535 (Postdisposition Hearings) and forms 8.911 (Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act Affidavit); 8.930 (Juvenile Notice to Appear); 8.964 (Dependency Petition); 8.966 (Adjudication Order-Dependency); 8.980 (Petition for Termination of Parental Rights Based on Voluntary Relinquishment); 8.981 (Petition for Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights); 8.983 (Adjudication Order and Judgment of Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights); and the adoption of new form 8.975 (Dependency Order Withholding Adjudication).

Prior to filing its report with the Court, the Committee published the proposed amendments in The Florida Bar News. It received one comment. After the Committee filed its report with the Court, the proposed amendments were again published in The Florida Bar News. The Court received seven comments. One of the seven was by the same commenter who responded to the first publication and raised the same issues as his comment to the Committee.

The Committee filed a response to the comments, reiterating its adherence to its original recommendations. According to the response, the Committee considered many of the issues raised by the comments during its deliberative process, but concluded the proposed amendments were needed.

After considering the comments and holding oral argument, we adopt most of the Committee's proposed amendments without change, adopt a few with minor modifications, and adopt the new form as proposed, as discussed below.

DISCUSSION

The great majority of the amendments proposed by the Committee received no comment. We adopt without change the proposed amendments to rules 8.045, 8.135, 8.210, 8.257, 8.350, 8.515, and 8.535 and forms 8.911, 8.930, 8.964, 8.966, 8.980, 8.981, 8.983.[1] We also adopt without change the proposed new form 8.975.

We adopt the proposed amendment to rule 8.090 (Speedy Trial) with minor modification. The Committee proposed amending subdivision (a)(2) of the rule to change the event that triggers the running of the speedy trial deadline. Currently, the time begins to run when the petition is filed. With the proposed amendment the time would begin to run on "[t]he date the summons issued on the filing of the petition was served." This will conform the rule to section 985.219, Florida Statutes (2005).

We agree the amendment is needed to conform the rule, but believe the suggested wording is potentially confusing. We reword it to read: "The date of service of the summons that is issued when the petition is filed" and adopt it as rewritten.

Other than a comment by the Guardian Ad Litem Office in support of the proposed amendment to rule 8.350 (Placement of Child Into Residential Treatment Center After Adjudication of Dependency), all of the comments received were addressed to the proposed amendments to rule 8.257 (General Magistrates). Accordingly, we address most of our remarks to these proposed amendments.

We adopt the proposed amendment to subdivision (f) of rule 8.257. The Committee proposed changing the word "serve" to the word "file" in the first sentence of that subdivision. This change will make subdivision (f) mirror the language in subdivision (e) that refers to the filing of exceptions within ten days. We are cognizant that the current wording of subdivision (f) matches the current wording of several other rules giving the parties ten days to "serve" exceptions to a magistrate's report. See Fla. Fam. L.R.P. 12.490(f), 12.492(g); Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.490(h); Fla. Prob. R. 5.697(f). We nevertheless find it more imperative for the rule to be internally consistent than for it to match other rules providing for the service of exceptions in other given cases.

Although we are sympathetic to the arguments raised by the commenters to the proposed amendment to subdivision (h) of rule 8.257, which would prohibit magistrates from conducting shelter hearings under section 39.402, Florida Statutes (2005), and adjudicatory hearings under sections 39.507 or 39.809, Florida Statutes (2005), we nevertheless conclude the proposed amendments are necessary and adopt them.[2] There is currently no meaningful opportunity for the child to object to a magistrate conducting a hearing under these provisions. Consequently, there is also no opportunity for the child to waive an objection to the referral. Without provision for such an opportunity in the rules, we believe these hearings must be conducted by an article V judge.[3]

CONCLUSION

We hereby adopt the amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments will become effective on January 1, 2007, at 12:01 a.m.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

APPENDIX

RULE 8.045. NOTICE TO APPEAR

(a) — (e) [No Change]

(f) Contents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A.T.N. v. Florida Department of Children & Family Services
70 So. 3d 634 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
24 So. 3d 47 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2009)
In Re Amendments to Rules of Juvenile Proc.
951 So. 2d 804 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
939 So. 2d 74, 2006 Fla. LEXIS 2210, 2006 WL 2690230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rules-of-juvenile-procedure-fla-2006.