In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 21, 2024
DocketSC2023-0837
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, (Fla. 2024).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2023-0837 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION.

March 21, 2024

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration Committee has filed a report with its proposed

refinements to the Workgroup on the Improved Resolution of Civil

Cases’ proposals to amend the Florida Rules of General Practice

and Judicial Administration. 1 Except as modified below, we adopt

the amendments proposed by the Committee. We also direct the

Commission on Trial Court Performance and Accountability to

monitor the effect of these amendments for one year and to provide

us with updated recommendations at year’s end.

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(f). BACKGROUND

In 2022, the Workgroup2 submitted a final report proposing

amendments to the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration and multiple other rule sets aimed at promoting the

fair and timely resolution of civil cases. The proposed amendments

provided for court case management of civil cases with early judicial

intervention, adherence to established deadlines, and reporting of

case management data. Because additional refinements were

needed, we declined to adopt the Workgroup’s proposals, opting

instead to make a series of phased referrals for the “refinement and

study of the Workgroup’s proposals.” In re Report &

Recommendations of Workgroup on Improved Resolution of Civil

Cases, No. SC2022-0122 (Fla. Jan. 12, 2023).

2. Established by the Court in 2019, the Workgroup was tasked with examining Florida’s “laws, rules of court, and practices relating to civil procedure and case management to determine whether changes can be made to improve the resolution of civil cases . . . includ[ing] consideration of whether this state’s laws and rules of court sufficiently address and deter a failure to prosecute, a violation of discovery, presentation of an unsupported claim or defense, and causation of an improper delay in litigation.” In re Workgroup on Improved Resolution of Civil Cases, Admin. Order No. AOSC2019-73 (Fla. Oct. 31, 2019).

-2- We made one such referral to the Rules of General Practice

and Judicial Administration Committee, tasking it with refining the

Workgroup’s proposed changes to the Florida Rules of General

Practice and Judicial Administration. After thoroughly considering

the Workgroup’s report, the Committee has now filed a report with

its suggested refinements to the Workgroup’s proposal for new rule

2.546 (Active and Inactive Case Status) and for existing rules 2.215

(Trial Court Administration), 2.250 (Time Standards for Trial and

Appellate Courts and Reporting Requirements), and 2.550

(Calendar Conflicts). The Committee also proposes the addition of

new forms 2.604 (Notice of Pending Matter), 2.605 (Notice of

Inactive Status), and 2.606 (Notice of Active Status).

The Florida Bar’s Board of Governors unanimously

recommends acceptance of the proposed amendments. We

published the Committee’s proposals for comment and received one

comment from Judge Frederick Pollack, a circuit court judge in the

Sixth Judicial Circuit. The Committee filed a response to the

comment.

Having considered the reports from both the Committee and

the Workgroup, the comment received, and the Committee’s

-3- response, we adopt the amendments to the Florida Rules of General

Practice and Judicial Administration proposed by the Committee

with some modifications. We explain the modifications below and

discuss some of the more significant rule amendments.

AMENDMENTS

First, to promote efficient case management, the existing

reporting requirement in rule 2.215(f) (Duty to Rule within a

Reasonable Time) is amended to require a judge to maintain a log of

all matters, not just cases, held under advisement and to notify the

chief judge each month of all matters that have been held under

advisement for more than 60 days. The Committee proposed

amending rule 2.215(f) to also require judges to report matters

“ready for disposition.” But we decline to make this change

because a listing of all matters held under advisement for more

than 60 days would necessarily include any matter that is “ready

for disposition.”

Additionally, rule 2.215 is amended to include new subdivision

(f)(2) (Notice of Pending Matter). Under the new subdivision, a party

may prompt a judge to rule on a matter that has been pending for

more than 60 days by filing a notice with the clerk and serving a

-4- copy on the judge. New form 2.604 contains a sample notice for

use in providing notice under the rule.

Rule 2.250(a) (Time Standards) is amended to add a time

standard of 30 months for complex cases and to clarify when the

time standards for civil cases begin and end. And rule 2.250(b)

(Reporting of Cases) is amended to require the chief judge of each

circuit to serve on the chief justice and the state court

administrator an annual report listing all active civil cases that

have been pending three or more years.

New rule 2.546 requires the parties in all types of proceedings

to notify a court of a case’s change in status. The new rule is

divided into two parts. Subdivision (a) (Required Stay) addresses

changing a case’s status when a stay is required by law, while

subdivision (b) (Requested Stay) addresses changing a case’s status

when a stay is requested but not required by law. Under

subdivision (a), and in instances such as a bankruptcy stay, a party

need only promptly file a notice indicating a change in the case’s

status to place it on active or inactive status; no court action is

needed. New forms 2.605 and 2.606 contain sample notices for use

in providing notice of a case’s status under subdivision (a).

-5- Under subdivision (b), a party may file a motion requesting a

change in case status, but absent a stipulation that a pending

appellate ruling in another matter will be dispositive, or a showing

of extraordinary circumstances, a court will not grant a request to

place a case on inactive status. To ensure that a party is required

to act with the same level of promptness in restoring a case to

active status under both subdivisions, we revise subdivision (b)(2)

to read: “A party must promptly move to restore a case to active

status when circumstances make inactive status unnecessary.” We

also revise the first sentence of subdivision (b)(3) to clarify that a

party filing a motion seeking a change in case status under the rule

must serve a copy of the motion and a proposed order on the

presiding judge at the time the motion is filed.

Lastly, rule 2.550(c) (Notice and Agreement; Resolution by

Judges) is amended to clarify that when a lawyer is scheduled to

appear in two courts at the same time, the presiding judges must

confer and resolve the conflict.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, the Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration are amended as set forth in the appendix to this

-6- opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are

indicated by struck-through type. The amendments become

effective on July 1, 2024, at 12:01 a.m.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rules-of-general-practice-and-judicial-fla-2024.