In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420 and 2.533

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2023
DocketSC2023-0014
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420 and 2.533 (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420 and 2.533) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420 and 2.533, (Fla. 2023).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2023-0014 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULES OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.420 AND 2.533.

May 11, 2023

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration Committee (Committee) has filed a report proposing

amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial

Administration 2.420 (Public Access to and Protection of Judicial

Branch Records) and the addition of new rule 2.533 (Oaths and

Affirmations in Court). 1 The Committee and the Board of Governors

of The Florida Bar unanimously approved the proposed

amendments. The proposal was previously published for comment

by the Committee, but no comments were received.

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const; Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(1). Having considered the proposed amendments, the Court

hereby amends rule 2.420 and adopts rule 2.533 as proposed by

the Committee, with a minor modification to rule 2.533 for

consistency with rule 2.530 (Communication Technology). Among

other amendments, rule 2.420 is amended to include “documents

related to the settlement of a minor’s claim or the settlement of a

claim for a ward” as information that the clerk of court must

maintain as confidential in accordance with section 744.3701,

Florida Statutes (2022). New rule 2.533 addresses who is

authorized to administer oaths to jurors and witnesses in court.

The Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration are hereby amended as set forth in the appendix to

this opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions

are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall

become effective July 1, 2023, at 12:01 a.m. Because the

amendments were not published for comment prior to their

adoption, interested persons shall have seventy-five days from the

date of this opinion in which to file comments with the Court. 2

2. All comments must be filed with the Court on or before July 25, 2023, with a certificate of service verifying that a copy has -2- It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, and FRANCIS, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration

Hon. Stephen R. Jewett, Chair, Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration Committee, Orlando, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Kelly Noel Smith, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

been served on the Committee Chair, the Honorable Stephen R. Jewett, Ninth Judicial Circuit of Florida, 425 North Orange Avenue, Suite 465-A, Orlando, Florida 32801, ctjusj2@ocnjcc.org, and on the Bar Staff Liaisons to the Committee, Elizabeth Clark Tarbert, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300, etarbert@floridabar.org, and Kelly Smith, 651 East Jefferson Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2300, ksmith@floridabar.org, as well as a separate request for oral argument if the person filing the comment wishes to participate in oral argument, which may be scheduled in this case. The Committee Chair has until August 15, 2023, to file a response to any comments filed with the Court. If filed by an attorney in good standing with The Florida Bar, the comment must be electronically filed via the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal (Portal). If filed by a nonlawyer or a lawyer not licensed to practice in Florida, the comment may be, but is not required to be, filed via the Portal. Any person unable to submit a comment electronically must mail or hand-deliver the originally signed comment to the Florida Supreme Court, Office of the Clerk, 500 South Duval Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1927. -3- APPENDIX RULE 2.420. PUBLIC ACCESS TO AND PROTECTION OF JUDICIAL BRANCH RECORDS

(a) Scope and Purpose. Subject to the rulemaking power of the Florida Supreme Court provided by article V, section 2, Florida Constitution, the following rule shall governs public access to and the protection of the records of the judicial branch of government. The public shall havehas access to all records of the judicial branch of government, except as provided below. Access to all electronic and other court records shall beis governed by the Standards for Access to Electronic Court Records and Access Security Matrix, as adopted by the supreme court in Administrative Order AOSC14-19 or the then-current Standards for Access. Remote access to electronic court records shall beis permitted in counties where the supreme court’s conditions for release of suchthose records are met.

(b) Definitions.

(1) “Records of the judicial branch” are all records, regardless of physical form, characteristics, or means of transmission, made or received in connection with the transaction of official business by any judicial branch entity and consist of:

(A) [No Change]

(B) “administrative records,” which are all other records made or received pursuant tounder court rule, law, or ordinance, or in connection with the transaction of official business by any judicial branch entity.

(2) [No Change]

(3) “Custodian.” The custodian of all administrative records of any court is the chief justice or chief judge of that court, except that each justice or judge is the custodian of all records that are solely within the possession of that justice or judge. At the conclusion of service on a court, each justice or judge shallmust

-4- deliver to the court’s chief justice or chief judge any records of the judicial branch in the possession of the departing justice or judge. As to all other records, the custodian is the official charged with the responsibility for the care, safekeeping, and supervision of such records. All references to “custodian” mean the custodian or the custodian’s designee.

(4) “Confidential,” as applied to information contained within a record of the judicial branch, means that such information is exempt from the public right of access under article I, section 24(a) of the Florida Constitution and may be released only to the persons or organizations designated by law, statute, or court order. As applied to information contained within a court record, the term “exempt” means that such information is confidential. Confidential information includes information that is confidential under this rule or under a court order entered pursuant tounder this rule. To the extent reasonably practicable, restriction of access to confidential information shall beis implemented in a manner that does not restrict access to any portion of the record that is not confidential.

(5)-(6) [No Change]

(c) Confidential and Exempt Records. The following records of the judicial branch shall beare confidential:.

(1) [No Change]

(2) Memoranda or advisory opinions that relate to the administration of the court and that require confidentiality to protect a compelling governmental interest, including, but not limited to, maintaining court security, facilitating a criminal investigation, or protecting public safety, which cannot be adequately protected by less restrictive measures. The degree, duration, and manner of confidentiality imposed shallmust be no broader than necessary to protect the compelling governmental interest involved, and a finding shall be made that no less- restrictive measures are available to protect this interest must be made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc.
531 So. 2d 113 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Sirmons
508 So. 2d 462 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Lewis
426 So. 2d 1 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1982)
Seigle v. Barry
422 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)
State Ex Rel. Tallahassee Democrat, Inc. v. Cooksey
371 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.420 and 2.533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rules-of-general-practice-and-judicial-fla-2023.