In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.230
This text of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.230 (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.230) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida ____________
No. SC19-533 ____________
IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.230.
July 11, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The Court, on its own motion, amends Florida Rule of Judicial
Administration 2.230(e) (Trial Court Budget Commission; Membership and
Organization).1 See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(g).
The Court published the amendments to rule 2.230 for comment. No
comments were filed. The Court now amends that rule as follows. Subdivision (e)
of rule 2.230 is amended to provide that the Chief Justice will appoint members to
the Trial Court Budget Commission “who are from different levels of court (circuit
or county).” Subdivision (e)(1) is amended to require the membership of the
Commission to include a minimum of twelve, rather than fourteen, trial judges and
1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const. a minimum of five, rather than seven, trial court administrators. Language in
subdivision (e)(5) addressing appointment of original Commission members is
deleted as obsolete. The last paragraph of the rule is moved to subdivision (e)(5)
and new language is added providing that voting members may serve “no more
than two full terms” and “[n]otwithstanding that limitation, the chief justice may
appoint a member for additional terms if [this Court] determines it is in the best
interests of the trial courts.” Language is added to the last sentence providing that
appointment to serve the remainder of a departing member’s term “shall not count
toward the limitation on the number of terms.”
Accordingly, the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration are amended as
set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New language is indicated by
underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments
shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, LAGOA, LUCK, and MUÑIZ, JJ., concur.
THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.
Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
-2- APPENDIX
RULE 2.230. TRIAL COURT BUDGET COMMISSION
(a) – (d) [No Change]
(e) Membership and Organization. The Trial Court Budget Commission will be composed of 21 voting members appointed by the chief justice who will be trial court judges and trial court administrators and who will represent the interests of the trial courts generally rather than the individual interests of a particular circuit, level of court, or division. The respective presidents of the Conference of Circuit Court Judges, and the Conference of County Court Judges, and the chair of the Commission on Trial Court Performance and Accountability shall serve as ex officio nonvoting members of the Ccommission. The chief justice will make appointments to ensure that the broad interests of the trial courts are represented by including members who are from different levels of court (circuit or county), who have experience in different divisions, who have expertise in court operations or administrative matters, and who offer geographic, racial, ethnic, and gender diversity.
(1) The membership must include 14a minimum of 12 trial court judges and 7a minimum of 5 trial court administrators.
(2) – (4) [No Change]
(5) The original members of the commission will be appointed as follows: (A) 7 members shall be appointed for a 2-year term;
(B) 7 members shall be appointed for a 4-year term; and
(C) 7 members shall be appointed for one 6-year term. All subsequentVoting members will each be appointed for onea 6-year term and may serve no more than two full terms. Notwithstanding that limitation, the chief justice may appoint a member for additional terms if the supreme court determines it is in the best interests of the trial courts. In the event of a vacancy, the chief justice will appoint a new member to serve for the remainder of the departing member’s term, which service shall not count toward the limitation on the number of terms.
-3- (6) [No Change]
(f) [No Change]
-4-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.230, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rule-of-judicial-administration-2230-fla-2019.