In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.140

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJanuary 9, 2025
DocketSC2023-1373
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.140 (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.140) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.140, (Fla. 2025).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC2023-1373 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF GENERAL PRACTICE AND JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.140.

January 9, 2025

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar’s Rules of General Practice and Judicial

Administration Committee filed a report proposing a complete

reorganization of Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial

Administration 2.140 (Amending Rules of Court), as well as changes

to the rule amendment process to address two recommendations

made by retired State Courts Administrator Elisabeth Kiel in her

“Evaluation of Development and Review of Court Rules Proposals by

The Florida Bar Rules Committees” (Kiel report). 1 We decline to

amend rule 2.140 as proposed and reorganized by the Committee

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; see also Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b). and instead amend the existing version of the rule to align with the

two recommendations from the Kiel report.

AMENDMENTS

In her 2022 report, Kiel thoroughly examined the rule

amendment process and identified several factors that either

prolong or delay the rule amendment process. She made several

recommendations to make the rule amendment process more

streamlined and efficient.

One recommendation Kiel made in her report is to alter the

publication requirements for proposed rule amendments.

Currently, under rule 2.140(b)(2), rules committees are required to

publish proposed rule amendments for comment on the Bar’s

website and in the print edition of The Florida Bar News before filing

them with the Court. The Court generally republishes proposed

rule amendments for comment once they are filed on its website,

the Bar’s website, and in the print edition of The Florida Bar News.

See Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(5). Kiel recommends

doing away with publication in the print edition of The Florida Bar

News and allow, at least at the rules committee level, proposed rule

changes to be published only on the Bar’s website.

-2- We agree with Kiel’s recommendation and amend rule

2.140(b)(2) to make the Bar’s website the only place rules

committees are required to publish proposed rule amendments

before filing their reports with the Court. Under the amended rule,

rules committees may continue to publish proposed rule

amendments in the print edition of The Florida Bar News to obtain

as much feedback as possible on a proposal before filing a report

with the Court. If a rules committee elects to publish proposed rule

amendments in the print edition of The Florida Bar News, the

deadline for comments in response to the print publication must be

the same as the deadline for comments in response to the

publication on the Bar’s website.

Another recommendation Kiel made in her report is to alter

the role of The Florida Bar Board of Governors (Board) in the rule

amendment process. Since the 1980 adoption of the current Bar-

appointed rules committee system for amending procedural rules,

the Board has been required to vote to recommend acceptance,

rejection, or amendment of every committee proposal. See In re Fla.

Rules of Jud. Admin., 389 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 1980); Fla. R. Gen. Prac.

& Jud. Admin. 2.140(b)(3). To expedite the rule amendment

-3- process and to get the Board involved in the process sooner, Kiel

recommends doing away with the requirement that the Board vote

on each rule proposal. She suggests engaging the Board through

the comment process when rule proposals are pending at the rules

committee level and before the Court.

We agree with this recommendation, too, and amend rule

2.140 throughout to change the Board’s role in the rule amendment

process. Under the amended rule, the Board will no longer review

and vote on each rule proposal before it is filed with the Court.

Instead, the Board will have the option to submit a comment on a

proposed rule change when it is pending before a rules committee

or the Court. To ensure the Board is made aware of all proposed

rule changes, rule 2.140(b)(2) is amended to require the Board to

receive a copy of each proposal when it is published for comment by

a rules committee, and newly relettered subdivision (b)(3) is

amended to require each rules committee to provide the Board with

a copy of its report when it is filed with the Court.

Last, we amend rule 2.140(f)(2) (No Action Recommendations)

to clarify that rules committees must submit all “no action reports”

to the “clerk of the supreme court.”

-4- CONCLUSION

Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration

2.140 is amended as set forth in the appendix to this opinion. New

language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by

struck-through type. The amendments become effective on April 1,

2025, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, LABARGA, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration

Hon. Santo DiGangi, Chair, Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration Committee, West Palm Beach, Florida, Kristin A. Norse, Past Chair, Rules of General Practice and Judicial Administration Committee, Tampa, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, and Kelly Noel Smith, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida,

for Petitioner

-5- APPENDIX

RULE 2.140. AMENDING RULES OF COURT

(a) [No Change]

(b) Rules Proposals.

(1) [No Change]

(2) Before filing a report of proposed rule changes with the supreme court, the committee report shall be furnished to the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President of the Florida Senate, and the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated by the Speaker and the President, and The Florida Bar Board of Governors. The proposed rule changes must be published on the website of The Florida Bar. andThe proposed rule changes may also be published in the print edition of The Florida Bar News with the same deadline for comment submission as the website publication. Any person desiring to comment upon proposed rule changes shallmay submit written comments to the appropriate committee chair(s) as provided in the notice. The committee shall consider any comments submitted. Any changes made shall be furnished to the Speaker of the Florida House of Representatives, the President of the Florida Senate, and the chairs of the House and Senate committees as designated by the Speaker and the President, and The Florida Bar Board of Governors. The changes must be published on the website of The Florida Bar. andThe proposed rule changes may also be published in the print edition of The Florida Bar News with the same deadline for comment submission as the website publication. Any person desiring to comment thereafter shall submit written comments to the supreme court in accordance with subdivision (b)(65).

(3) After review of comments received and prior to the filing of a report by a committee, the board of governors shall consider the proposals and shall vote on each proposal to recommend acceptance, rejection, or amendment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Florida Rules of Judicial Administration
389 So. 2d 202 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rule-of-general-practice-and-judicial-fla-2025.