In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators 4.310, and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided August 25, 2022·No. SC22-312·Published

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida

No. SC22-312

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.220, FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT OF SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATORS 4.310, AND FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.060.

August 25, 2022

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court for consideration of proposed

amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220

(Discovery), Florida Rule of Civil Procedure for Involuntary

Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators 4.310 (Depositions Upon

Oral Examination), and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060

(Discovery).1 The proposed amendments, which we adopt with

modifications, preclude the visual recording of adult deponents

unless ordered by a court or agreed to by the parties and the

deponent, require the audiovisual recording of depositions of

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

minors unless otherwise ordered by a court, and prohibit the

photographing of deponents during discovery depositions.

I. BACKGROUND

Following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020, the

Court established the Workgroup on the Continuity of Court

Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19

(Workgroup) “to develop findings and recommendations on the

continuation of all court operations and proceedings statewide in a

manner that protects health and safety and that addresses each

[phase] of the pandemic.” In re Workgroup on the Continuity of Court

Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19, Fla. Admin.

Order No. AOSC20-28 (Apr. 21, 2020).2 During the Workgroup’s

2. The Workgroup was also directed to “[i]dentify whether certain proceedings, due to efficiencies beneficial to stakeholders, could continue to be conducted remotely when COVID-19 no longer presents a significant risk to public health and safety,” and the Workgroup was authorized to propose the necessary rule amendments. In re Workgroup on the Continuity of Court Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC20-28 (Apr. 21, 2020); see also In re Workgroup on the Continuity of Court Operations and Proceedings During and After COVID-19, Fla. Admin. Order No. AOSC20-110 (Nov. 23, 2020). Based on the positive outcomes and efficiencies observed during the pandemic, the Workgroup determined that permanent, broader authorization for remote proceedings was warranted, and proposed rule amendments authorizing the remote conduct of certain court

deliberations, the Florida Sheriff’s Association (FSA) expressed

concern that the audiovisual recording of depositions and the

photographing of deponents in criminal cases could result in

images or videos of certain witnesses, such as crime victims or law

enforcement officers, being shared on social media or the internet

for the purpose of harassment. The FSA believed the current

procedure to protect a witness’s identity during a deposition—i.e.,

moving for a protective order under Florida Rule of Criminal

Procedure 3.220(l) (Protective Orders) on a case-by-case basis—will

be inadequate in the long term as audio-video communication

technology is increasingly used to conduct depositions.

The Workgroup determined that the issues raised by the FSA

required in-depth consideration by subject matter experts. The

proceedings, which we considered in In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, Florida Rules of General Practice & Judicial Administration, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, Florida Probate Rules, Florida Rules of Traffic Court, Florida Small Claims Rules, & Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, 47 Fla. L. Weekly S187 (Fla. July 14, 2022). The Steering Committee on Families and Children in the Court likewise proposed rule amendments authorizing the remote conduct of certain delinquency, dependency, and family law proceedings, which we considered in In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Juvenile Procedure, Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, & Florida Supreme Court Approved Family Law Forms, 47 Fla. L. Weekly S188 (Fla. July 14, 2022).

Chief Justice thus tasked the Criminal Court Steering Committee

(Steering Committee) with reviewing the issues identified by the

FSA, and with determining whether any rule amendments were

needed.

The Steering Committee, after conducting a thorough review

and obtaining input from interested parties, found that there is no

compelling need to audiovisually record the deposition of an adult

deponent in criminal and juvenile cases, as discovery depositions in

such cases are generally not introduced as substantive evidence

and are mainly used for impeachment purposes only. It also found

that the audiovisual recording of depositions raises security and

public records concerns for law enforcement deponents, and that

similar concerns exist for adult deponents as well, as an

audiovisually recorded deposition may be shared via social media or

the internet to embarrass or pressure a deponent. But as to

minors, the Steering Committee found that there is still a need to

audiovisually record depositions, as minors are particularly

vulnerable to harassment or intimidation, and the audiovisual

recording of depositions enables the court to control such tactics.

See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220 Comm. Note.

Based on these findings, the Steering Committee proposes

amending rules 3.220, 4.310, and 8.060. The proposed

amendments were not published for comment by either the Steering

Committee or the Court. But in response to a motion from the

Criminal Procedure Rules Committee, the Court issued an order

authorizing all interested parties to file comments on the Steering

Committee’s proposals. Three comments were received, and the

Steering Committee filed a response to the comments.

Having considered the proposed amendments, the comments,

and the Steering Committee’s response, the Court adopts, with

modifications, the amendments proposed by the Steering

Committee. The more significant amendments are discussed below,

along with the changes to the Steering Committee’s proposals.

II. AMENDMENTS

Rules 3.220(h)(1), 4.310(b)(2), and 8.060(d)(2)(C) are amended

to make clear that courts possess broad authority to oversee the

taking of depositions and that they may enter orders necessary to

protect deponents, secure the rights of the parties, and ensure

compliance with statutes.

Rule 4.310(a) (When Depositions May be Taken) is amended to

clarify that unless the rule provides otherwise, the procedure for

taking a deposition under the rule is the same as that provided in

the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure.

Rule 3.220(h)(4) is retitled “Visual Recording and

Photographs,” and it, along with rule 4.310(b)(3), is amended to: (1)

preclude the visual recording of adult deponents unless ordered by

a court or agreed to by the parties and the deponent; (2) require the

audiovisual recording of depositions of minors unless otherwise

ordered by a court; and (3) prohibit the photographing of deponents

during discovery depositions. We, however, decline to adopt the

Steering Committee’s proposal to amend both rules to require the

stenographic recording of all audiovisually recorded depositions.

Such a requirement is unnecessary, and is inconsistent with the

stenographic recording requirements for audiovisually recorded

depositions in Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.310(b)(4)(B)

(Stenographer), which depositions taken under both rules must now

comply with. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.220(h)(1).

We also decline to adopt the Steering Committee’s proposal to

amend rule 8.060(d)(9) (Videotaped Depositions), and instead

amend the rule to increase to 18 the age under which the

depositions of children must be audiovisually recorded on the

demand of any party unless otherwise ordered by the court.

Rule 8.060(d)(1)(B) is amended to clarify that the location

requirements for taking a deposition do not apply to depositions

taken by communication technology. But we decline to likewise

amend rule 3.220(h)(3) (Location of Deposition), as the amendments

proposed by the Steering Committee have already been adopted by

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators 4.310, and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060, (Fla. 2022).

In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators 4.310, and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060 (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.220, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure for Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators 4.310, and Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.060) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 4.310
Oregon § 4.310