In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490

113 So. 3d 777, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1940, 2013 WL 1908646
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 9, 2013
DocketNo. SC13-684
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 113 So. 3d 777 (In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490, 113 So. 3d 777, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1940, 2013 WL 1908646 (Fla. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration an emergency petition proposing amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490 (Magistrates) filed by the Trial Court Budget Commission (Commission).1 See Fla. R. Jud. Admin. 2.140(d); 2.230(b)(6). The amendments, which we adopt as proposed, are intended to help alleviate the residential mortgage foreclosure case backlog Florida courts are currently facing.

BACKGROUND

The rule amendments were recommended by the Commission’s Foreclosure Initiative Workgroup (Workgroup) and approved by the Commission as part of an overall plan developed to address the significant number of mortgage foreclosure cases pending in Florida’s trial courts and expected to be filed in the next few years.2 See Trial Court Budget Commission’s Foreclosure Initiative Workgroup, Foreclosure Backlog Reduction Plan for the State Courts System: Recommendations of the Foreclosure Initiative Workgroup, (2013) (“Workgroup Report”).3 As explained in the Commission’s petition, one of the problems identified by the Work-group in its report is the limited availability of judicial resources to address the residential mortgage foreclosure case backlog, which the Workgroup determined is exacerbated by the law requiring retired judges to refrain from working as senior judges, except on a voluntary basis, for twelve months after retirement. See Workgroup Report at 16. Therefore, the Workgroup recommended amending rule 1.490 to expand the use of general magistrates as an alternative to the use of senior judges to assist in processing foreclosure cases. See Workgroup Report at 18, 28. We thank the Commission and the Foreclosure Initiative Workgroup for providing the Court with a comprehensive plan for addressing the mounting number of residential mortgage foreclosure cases in our courts and for suggesting the use of magistrates as a vehicle to provide additional judicial resources to efficiently process those cases.

AMENDMENTS

Rule 1.490 provides for the appointment of general and special magistrates, describes the powers and duties of magistrates, and states under what circumstances referrals to magistrates may be made. The amendments to the rule, which we adopt as proposed by the Commission, expand the use of general magistrates in residential mortgage foreclosure cases by authorizing referral of those cases to general magistrates based on implied consent of the parties, while providing an opportunity for objection by the parties.

Subdivision (a) (General Magistrates) of the rule currently provides for the appointment of general magistrates by judges of the circuit court. It requires every person appointed as a general magistrate to be a [779]*779member of The Florida Bar and to take the oath required of Constitutional officers, which must be recorded before the magistrate discharges the duties of the office. The amendment to subdivision (a) authorizes the chief judge of each judicial circuit to appoint the number of general magistrates needed to expeditiously preside over residential mortgage foreclosure actions and other related matters. The appointed magistrates must be members of The Florida Bar, but are not required to give bond or surety, as otherwise required by the rule.

Subdivision (c) (Reference) of the rule currently requires that no matter be referred to a magistrate without consent of the parties. The amendments authorize referral of residential mortgage foreclosure cases to a magistrate with the implied consent of the parties, but the parties are given the opportunity to object to the referral. This subdivision is also amended to provide language that must be included in bold type in the order of referral to ensure that the parties are given notice of the requirements of the rule. The amendments to this subdivision are modeled after Florida Family Law Rule of Procedure 12.490(b) and do not change the consent requirement for other civil cases.

Finally, we amend subdivision (d) (General Powers and Duties), as proposed, to prohibit magistrates appointed under the rule from practicing law of the same case type in the court in the county or circuit where the magistrate is appointed to serve.

Accordingly, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490 is amended as reflected in the appendix to the opinion. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments shall become effective immediately upon the release of this opinion. Because the amendments were not published for comment prior to their adoption, interested persons shall have sixty days from the date of this opinion in which to file comments with the Court.4

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 1.490 MAGISTRATES

(a) General Magistrates. Judges of the circuit court may appoint as many general magistrates from among the members of the Bar in the circuit as the judges [780]*780find necessary, and the general magistrates shall continue in office until removed by the court. The order making an appointment shall be recorded. Every person appointed as a general magistrate shall take the oath required of officers by the Constitution and the oath shall be recorded before the magistrate discharges any duties of that office. The chief .judge of each .judicial circuit shall appoint such number of magistrates to handle only residential mortgage foreclosures from among the members of the Bar in the circuit as are necessary to expeditiously preside over all actions and suits for the foreclosure of a mortgage on residential real property; and any other matter concerning the foreclosure of a mortgage on residential real property as allowed by the administrative order of the chief judge. Magistrates appointed to handle residential mortgage foreclosure matters only shall not be required to give bond or surety.

(b) [No Change]

(c) Reference.

(1) No reference shall be to a magistrate, either general or special, without the consent of the parties-, except consent to a magistrate for residential mortgage foreclosure actions and suits may be express or may be implied in accordance with the requirements of this rule.

(A) A written objection to the referral to a magistrate handling residential mortgage foreclosures must be filed within 10 days of the service of the order of referral.
(B) If the time set for the hearing is less than 10 days after service of the order of referral, the objection must be filed before commencement of the hearing.
(C) If the order of referral is served within the first 20 days after the service of the initial process, the time to file an objection is extended to the time within which to file a responsive pleading.
(D)Failure to file a written objection to a referral to the magistrate handling residential mortgage foreclosures within the applicable time period is deemed to be consent to the order of referral.

(2) The order of referral to a magistrate handling g residential mortgage foreclosures shall be in substantial conformity with this rule and shall contain the following language in bold type:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Focht v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
124 So. 3d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 3d 777, 2013 Fla. LEXIS 1940, 2013 WL 1908646, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rule-of-civil-procedure-1490-fla-2013.