In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442

CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 2022
DocketSC21-277
StatusPublished

This text of In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 (In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, (Fla. 2022).

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida ____________

No. SC21-277 ____________

IN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 1.442.

May 26, 2022

PER CURIAM.

The Court, on its own motion, is considering amendments to

Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442 (Proposals for Settlement). 1

The Court published proposed amendments to rule 1.442 in the

October 2021 edition of The Florida Bar News and received three

comments and one supplemental comment. After considering the

comments and oral argument, we amend subdivisions (c)(2)(C) and

(c)(2)(D) of rule 1.442 to exclude nonmonetary terms from a

proposal for settlement, with the exceptions of a voluntary dismissal

of all claims with prejudice and any other nonmonetary terms

permitted by statute.

1. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.; Fla. R. Gen. Prac. & Jud. Admin. 2.140(d). The amendments are intended to align rule 1.442 with the

substantive elements of Florida’s settlement proposal statutes.

Section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2021), does not provide for the

inclusion of nonmonetary terms in a proposal for settlement.

Instead, section 768.79 simply contemplates a comparison of

monetary amounts, with subsections (2)(c)-(d) of that statute

providing only that a settlement offer must “[s]tate its total amount”

and “[s]tate with particularity the amount offered to settle a claim

for punitive damages, if any.” See also Diecidue v. Lewis, 223 So.

3d 1015, 1022 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017) (Casanueva, J., concurring)

(“Where the legislature sought a straightforward proposal based

upon the acceptance or rejection of a monetary amount, the

allowance of nonmonetary conditions . . . alters the dynamics

envisioned by the legislature.”). However, section 70.001(4)(c),

Florida Statutes (2021), contains a list of nonmonetary terms that

governmental entities are permitted to include in settlement offers

when government action inordinately burdens private property

rights, such as “[t]he transfer of development rights” and “[l]and

swaps or exchanges.”

-2- Accordingly, to be consistent with the substantive elements of

the various settlement proposal statutes, we amend Florida Rule of

Civil Procedure 1.442 as reflected in the appendix to this opinion.

New language is underscored; deletions are indicated by struck-

through type. The amendments shall become effective July 1,

2022, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

CANADY, C.J., and POLSTON, LABARGA, LAWSON, MUÑIZ, COURIEL, and GROSSHANS, JJ., concur.

THE FILING OF A MOTION FOR REHEARING SHALL NOT ALTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THESE AMENDMENTS.

Original Proceeding – Florida Rules of Civil Procedure

Jason P. Stearns, Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tampa, Florida, Joshua E. Doyle, Executive Director, and Mikalla Andies Davis, Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida; Kansas R. Gooden of Boyd & Jenerette, PA, Miami, Florida, on behalf of the Florida Defense Lawyers Association; John S. Mills and Thomas D. Hall of Bishop & Mills, PLLC, Jacksonville, Florida, Bailey Howard of Bishop & Mills, PLLC, Tallahassee, Florida, Brent G. Steinberg of Swope, Rodante P.A., Tampa, Florida, Andrew A. Harris of Harris Appeals, P.A., Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, and Rebecca Bowen Creed of Creed & Gowdy, P.A., Jacksonville, Florida, on behalf of the Florida Justice Association,

Responding with comments

-3- APPENDIX

RULE 1.442. PROPOSALS FOR SETTLEMENT

(a)-(b) [No Change]

(c) Form and Content of Proposal for Settlement.

(1) [No Change]

(2) A proposal shall:

(A) name the party or parties making the proposal and the party or parties to whom the proposal is being made;

(B) state that the proposal resolves all damages that would otherwise be awarded in a final judgment in the action in which the proposal is served, subject to subdivision (F);

(C) state with particularity any relevant conditionsexclude nonmonetary terms, with the exceptions of a voluntary dismissal of all claims with prejudice and any other nonmonetary terms permitted by statute;

(D) state the total amount of the proposal and state with particularity all nonmonetary terms of the proposal;

(E) state with particularity the amount proposed to settle a claim for punitive damages, if any;

(F) state whether the proposal includes attorneys’ fees and whether attorneys’ fee are part of the legal claim; and

(G) include a certificate of service in the form required by Florida Rule of General Practice and Judicial Administration 2.516.

(3)-(4) [No Change]

-4- (d)-(j) [No Change]

Committee Notes

[No Change]

-5-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Diecidue v. Lewis
223 So. 3d 1015 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
In Re: Amendments to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-florida-rule-of-civil-procedure-1442-fla-2022.