In Re Amendments to Fla. Small Claims Rules

931 So. 2d 78, 2005 WL 3429592
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 11, 2006
DocketSC05-146
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 931 So. 2d 78 (In Re Amendments to Fla. Small Claims Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendments to Fla. Small Claims Rules, 931 So. 2d 78, 2005 WL 3429592 (Fla. 2006).

Opinion

931 So.2d 78 (2005)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES (TWO YEAR CYCLE).

No. SC05-146.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 15, 2005.
As Revised on Denial of Rehearing May 11, 2006.

Honorable Louis Howard Schiff, Chair, Deerfield Beach, Florida, Honorable Pauline Drayton, Past-Chair, Jacksonville, Florida, Small Claims Rules Committee, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, Madelon Horwich, Bar Staff Liaison, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, Florida, for Petitioner.

Honorable Shawn Lee Briese, Chair, Supreme Court Commission on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy, Daytona Beach, FL, and Robert N. Clarke, Jr. of Ausley and McMullen, P.A., Past-Chair, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Tallahassee, FL, for Opponent.

Bruce J. Berman of McDermott, Will and Emery, LLP, Miami, FL, and Henry P. Trawick, Jr., Sarasota, FL, filing Comments.

PER CURIAM.

We have for consideration the biennial report of proposed rule changes filed by the Small Claims Rules Committee (Committee), in accordance with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c)(4). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

BACKGROUND

The Committee's regular-cycle report proposes amendments to rules 7.080 (Service of Pleadings and Papers Other Than Statement of Claim), and 7.090 (Appearance; Defensive Pleadings; Trial Date), as well as the addition of new rule 7.175 (Motions for Costs and Attorneys' Fees). The Committee also proposes amendments to forms 7.322 (Summons/Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference), 7.340 (Final Judgment), and 7.343 (Fact Information Sheet), and the addition of new forms 7.321 (Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference/Mediation), 7.335 (Statement of Claim (For Return of Stolen Property)), and 7.350 (Corporate Authorization to Allow Employee to Represent Corporation at Any Stage of Lawsuit). As required by rule 2.130(c)(2), prior to submission to the Court, the proposed rule amendments were published in The Florida Bar News and on the internet website of The Florida Bar, and interested parties were invited to comment. Several comments were received by the Committee, but no changes were made to the proposals. After submission to the Court, the proposals were again published for comment, and several comments were received. After considering the comments and holding oral argument, we adopt a majority of the Committee's proposals, with a limited number of exceptions and modifications as set out below.

AMENDMENTS

First, we decline to adopt the proposed amendment to rule 7.080(b), Service of Pleadings and Papers Other Than Statement of Claim. This proposed amendment would allow service of papers (except the initial claim and notice to appear) to be made by delivery to the clerk of court if the party's address is not known. However, it fails to specify the consequence of such delivery. Neither the comments nor oral argument adequately resolved this uncertainty. Therefore, we decline to adopt this proposed rule change.

*79 We also decline to adopt the proposed amendments to rule 7.090, Appearance; Defensive Pleadings; Trial Date. The proposed amendments to subdivisions (a) and (b) of rule 7.090 were proposed by the Supreme Court Committee on Alternative Dispute Resolution Rules and Policy (ADR Committee) in its comment filed with the Court. The Committee did not object to the suggested changes. The proposed amendment to subdivision (a) would have required, "Whoever appears for a party [at the pretrial conference] must have full authority to settle for all amounts from zero to the amount of the claim without further consultation." The proposed amendment to subdivision (b) would have required that the summons/notice to appear specify that mediation may take place during the time scheduled for the pretrial conference. This proposal, if accepted, would conform the notice to appear to the proposed changes to subdivisions (a) and (f).

The proposed amendment to subdivision (f) would not only provide that "mediation may take place at pretrial conference," it would also mandate that each party or their counsel have full authority to settle. And, of greatest concern, it would allow sanctions for failure to comply. These sanctions include costs, attorneys' fees, entry of judgment, or dismissal. Among our concerns about this proposal is the impact it would have upon a party who must send counsel to such conferences on short notice without an adequate opportunity to fully prepare for settlement negotiations. Nonetheless, recognizing the importance of this effort at encouraging mediated settlement, we refer this proposed amendment back to the Committee for further consideration.

Next, we decline to adopt the Committee's proposed amendments to form 7.322, Summons/Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference. Having declined to adopt the proposed changes to rule 7.090, we also decline to adopt new form 7.321, Notice to Appear for Pretrial Conference/Mediation, as proposed by the ADR Committee, and agreed to by the Committee.

We adopt, as modified, new rule 7.175, Motions for Costs and Attorneys' Fees, permitting motions for costs and attorneys' fees if timely filed. In response to comments filed, we modify the language originally proposed by the Committee to reflect that a motion seeking costs or attorneys' fees or both shall be served "no later than" thirty days after the judgment is filed. This change is consistent with changes to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure which this Court has adopted in a separate opinion. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, 917 So.2d 176 (Fla.2005).

We also adopt new form 7.335, Statement of Claim (For Return of Stolen Property). According to the report,

[t]he form is meant to allow for uniformity in the return of property that was stolen and then pawned, to be returned to the rightful owner even before the criminal case is disposed of. The committee believed that the rightful owner of the property should not be required to redeem his or her property by making any form of payment.

Form 7.340, Final Judgment, is amended, as proposed, to delete the reference to future interest rates. The amendment to the form is meant to put all parties on notice of the interest rate that should accrue on judgments.

New subdivision (b) is added to form 7.343, Fact Information Sheet. The new subdivision recognizes the distinction between a judgment entered against an individual and a judgment entered against a corporation.

*80 Finally, we adopt new form 7.350, Corporate Authorization to Allow Employee to Represent Corporation at Any Stage of Lawsuit. This new form provides a mechanism for a corporation to authorize an individual to represent it in all trial proceedings. The form will provide written notice to all parties that the individual appearing at the pretrial and all subsequent proceedings has authority to act on behalf of the corporation.

We hereby adopt the amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules as set forth in the appendix to this opinion.[1] New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The amendments will become effective on January 1, 2006, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

PARIENTE, C.J., and WELLS, ANSTEAD, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

RULE 7.175. MOTIONS FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Amendments to Fla. Small Claims Rule 7.090
985 So. 2d 1033 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)
In Re Amendments to Fl. Rules of Civ. Proc.
917 So. 2d 176 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
931 So. 2d 78, 2005 WL 3429592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendments-to-fla-small-claims-rules-fla-2006.