In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules

798 S.E.2d 444, 419 S.C. 411, 2017 WL 1378435, 2017 S.C. LEXIS 68

Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided March 30, 2017·No. Appellate Case No. 2017-000219·Published

Opinion

ORDER

The South Carolina Bar has filed a petition to amend Rule 410, SCACR, to reclassify certain federal administrative law [412] judges as Administrative Law Judge Members by eliminating the requirement that those judges primarily perform their duties within the State of South Carolina. We grant the Bar’s request to amend Rule 410(h)(1)(F), SCACR, to provide as follows:

(F) Administrative Law Judge or Workers’ Compensation Commission Member. This class shall include any member who is a judge on the South Carolina Administrative Law Court, is a federal administrative law judge or is a South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commissioner.

The amendment is effective immediately; however, members reclassified by this amendment are not entitled to any refund of license fees for License Year 2017.

/s/Donald W. Beatty, C.J.

/s/John W. Kittredge, J.

/s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

/s/John Cannon Few, J.

/s/George C. James, Jr„ J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The South Carolina Bar has filed a petition to amend Rule 410, SCACR, to reclassify certain federal administrative law [412] judges as Administrative Law Judge Members by eliminating the requirement that those judges primarily perform their duties within the State of South Carolina. We grant the Bar’s request to amend Rule 410(h)(1)(F), SCACR, to provide as follows:

(F) Administrative Law Judge or Workers’ Compensation Commission Member. This class shall include any member who is a judge on the South Carolina Administrative Law Court, is a federal administrative law judge or is a South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commissioner.

The amendment is effective immediately; however, members reclassified by this amendment are not entitled to any refund of license fees for License Year 2017.

/s/Donald W. Beatty, C.J.

/s/John W. Kittredge, J.

/s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

/s/John Cannon Few, J.

/s/George C. James, Jr„ J.

In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules, 798 S.E.2d 444, 419 S.C. 411, 2017 WL 1378435, 2017 S.C. LEXIS 68 (S.C. 2017).

Pincite

798 S.E.2d 444 (In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.