In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules

798 S.E.2d 444, 419 S.C. 411, 2017 WL 1378435, 2017 S.C. LEXIS 68

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedMarch 30, 2017

DocketAppellate Case No. 2017-000219

StatusPublished

This text of 798 S.E.2d 444 (In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Amendment to Rule 410, South Carolina Appellate Court Rules, 798 S.E.2d 444, 419 S.C. 411, 2017 WL 1378435, 2017 S.C. LEXIS 68 (S.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The South Carolina Bar has filed a petition to amend Rule 410, SCACR, to reclassify certain federal administrative law [412]*412judges as Administrative Law Judge Members by eliminating the requirement that those judges primarily perform their duties within the State of South Carolina. We grant the Bar’s request to amend Rule 410(h)(1)(F), SCACR, to provide as follows:

(F) Administrative Law Judge or Workers’ Compensation Commission Member. This class shall include any member who is a judge on the South Carolina Administrative Law Court, is a federal administrative law judge or is a South Carolina Workers’ Compensation Commissioner.

The amendment is effective immediately; however, members reclassified by this amendment are not entitled to any refund of license fees for License Year 2017.

/s/Donald W. Beatty, C.J.

/s/John W. Kittredge, J.

/s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

/s/John Cannon Few, J.

/s/George C. James, Jr„ J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI