In Re Amendment to Rule 1.19--Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct

2019 Ark. 354
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 21, 2019
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 Ark. 354 (In Re Amendment to Rule 1.19--Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amendment to Rule 1.19--Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct, 2019 Ark. 354 (Ark. 2019).

Opinion

Cite as 2019 Ark. 354 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Opinion Delivered: November 21, 2019

IN RE AMENDMENT TO RULE 1.19- ARKANSAS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT

PER CURIAM

On December 15, 2016, we adopted Rule 1.19 of the Arkansas Rules of

Professional Conduct, which addresses issues related to the maintenance of a client’s file

and rights and obligations to materials contained in the file. In re Rule 1.19-Arkansas Rules

of Prof’l Conduct, 2016 Ark. 468 (per curiam). The new rule became effective on January 1,

2017. We now adopt minor changes to this rule to ensure that the language in Rule

1.19(b)(3) regarding the notice that must be provided to the client is consistent with

subsection (b)(2). The revised rule is published below, with the changes set forth in “line-

in, line-out” fashion (new material is underlined; deleted material is lined through).

Arkansas Rules of Professional Conduct

Rule 1.19. Client Files - Definition, Retention & Destruction. (a) Client file - Definition and duty to provide copies of client-file documents to the client. The use of

the term “client” refers to both current and former clients.

(1) For purposes of these rules, the client file shall consist of any writings or

property provided by the client to the lawyer and any documents, in paper or electronic

format, that are the product of the lawyer’s representation, including pleadings,

correspondence, and other documents prepared or received by the lawyer in furtherance of

the representation. Documents that have not been filed with a tribunal, delivered or

served, or other documents drafted but unexecuted or undelivered that the client has

explicitly paid for the drafting, creation, or obtaining thereof, including such items as

transcripts, depositions, medical records, and reports of experts, shall be provided to the

client as part of the file.

(2) The following records are not included in the client file, even if they are

maintained by the lawyer in association with the representation and the client file, and

such records are not ones to which the client is entitled to review or receive a copy:

(A) The lawyer’s work product, which includes the documents the lawyer used to

reach an end product of the lawyer’s representation, the lawyer’s notes, and preliminary

drafts of pleadings and legal instruments;

(B) Internal memoranda prepared by or for the lawyer;

(C) Legal research materials prepared by or for the lawyer and factual research

materials, including investigative reports prepared by or for the lawyer for use in the

2 representation, unless the material has been specifically paid for by the client or procured

by the lawyer for the client’s use;

(D) Documents such as internal conflict checks, firm assignments, notes

regarding any ethics consultation, or records that might reveal the confidences of other

clients.

(E) Items not included in the list of excluded items shall be considered to be part

of the client file to which the client is entitled.

(3) Upon the client’s written request in any format, the lawyer shall surrender the

client’s original file or a copy of the file, in paper or electronic format, to the client. Upon

written authorization of the client, the lawyer shall surrender such file to the client’s new

lawyer. The lawyer may deliver a statement for costs of production to the client but may

not withhold delivery of the client file pending payment.

(4) The cost of copying the file shall be the responsibility of the client. If the lawyer

has in his or her possession client funds to be reimbursed for such copying cost, the lawyer

may be reimbursed for such cost from the client funds held by the lawyer. A lawyer who

has previously provided the client a copy of any part of the client file may charge the client

for additional copies of the same documents. The client shall be responsible for the

reasonable costs incurred in delivery, by mail or commercial-delivery service, of the client-

file materials outside the lawyer’s office. After delivery of the client file to the client or the

client’s new lawyer, the lawyer may deliver a statement of costs of copying of the file to the

client but may not withhold delivery of the client file pending payment.

3 (5) If the lawyer provides the original client file to the client, the lawyer may, at no

cost to the client, retain copies of all documents within the lawyer’s file for the lawyer’s

purposes.

(6) The terms and conditions of the allocation of copying and delivery costs

involved in the client file may be fixed by a written agreement between the client and the

lawyer at the inception of the representation.

(b) Client file retention and destruction.

(1) A lawyer shall take reasonable steps to maintain the client’s file in paper or

electronic format for five (5) years after the conclusion of the representation in a matter.

(2) At any time following the expiration of five (5) years following the conclusion of

the representation in a matter, a lawyer may destroy the client’s files related to the matter,

provided the lawyer has made reasonable efforts to provide notice to the client.

(3) The providing to the client of the lawyer’s file-retention-and-destruction policy in

any writing, including an engagement letter or agreement or termination of representation

letter, shall satisfy the notice requirement of this rule.

(4) Notwithstanding subparagraphs (1), (2), and (3), a lawyer in a criminal matter

shall maintain the client’s file for the life of the client if the matter resulted in a conviction,

by plea or trial, and sentence of death, natural life, or life without parole, unless the client’s

file is turned over to some appropriate, permanent central-file repository that maintains

such criminal case files in compliance with this rule.

4 (5) This rule does not supersede or limit a lawyer’s obligations to retain or destroy

contents of a client’s file as otherwise imposed by law, court order, or rules of a tribunal.

Comments:

[1] The Court has adopted a rule regarding the client file that generally follows the

“end product” approach as discussed in Travis v. Committee on Professional Conduct, 2009

Ark. 188. In this new rule, the Court has endeavored to balance the needs and interests of

the client with the obligations and burdens that may be placed on the lawyer and

attempted to give basic guidance that will be used to allow the client and the lawyer to

resolve any issues or disputes that may arise in these areas without resort to the courts or

other agencies. This rule does not attempt to address all scenarios that may arise, especially

in the area of whether the client has paid any, some, or all fees and costs incurred or

charged by the lawyer, recognizing the differences between engagements where the fee is

contingent, hourly, fixed, or otherwise based.

[2] At the beginning of representation and in writing, the lawyer should inform the

client of the client’s rights regarding the client file, including any potential charges that

may be associated with the lawyer’s providing the client with a copy of the client file or

duplicate copies of client file materials.

[3] This rule is not intended to impose an obligation on a lawyer to preserve

documents that the lawyer would not normally preserve, such as multiple copies or drafts

of the same document.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Travis v. Supreme Court Committee on Professional Conduct
2009 Ark. 188 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2009)
In re Ark. R. Prof'l Conduct 1.19
2016 Ark. 468 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 Ark. 354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendment-to-rule-119-arkansas-rules-of-professional-conduct-ark-2019.