In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191

542 So. 2d 1330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 240, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1287, 1989 WL 48933
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1989
DocketNo. 73741
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 542 So. 2d 1330 (In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191, 542 So. 2d 1330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 240, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1287, 1989 WL 48933 (Fla. 1989).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The state attorneys of Florida petition this Court to consider a proposed amendment to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191 pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 2(a), Fla. Const.

The proposed rule change provides similar procedures for dismissal for failure to abide by the speedy trial rule in both misdemeanor and felony cases. The intended effect of the amendment is to repeal the remedy of automatic discharge in misdemeanor cases. We agree with the state attorneys that there is no reason to treat misdemeanor cases in a manner different from felony cases. Therefore, we grant the petition and hereby adopt rule 3.191 as amended.

Appended to this opinion is the amended Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191. Deletions are indicated by use of struck-through type and new language is indicated by underscoring. All rules and statutes in conflict with the following rule are hereby superseded as of the effective date of these rules. These amendments shall become effective July 1, 1989, at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD and GRIMES, JJ., concur. KOGAN, J., dissents with an opinion, in which SHAW and BARKETT, JJ., concur.

RULE 3.191. Speedy Trial

(i)Remedy for Failure to Try Defendant within the Specified Time.

(1) No remedy shall be granted to any defendant under this Rule until the court shall have made the required inquiry under section (d)(3).
(2) In the case of a defendant charged with a misdemeanor, the defendant shall, upon motion timely made with the court at the expiration of the prescribed time period,-be forever discharged from the crime?
(2) (3) In the case of a defendant charged with a felony. The defendant may, at any time after the expiration of the prescribed time period, file a motion for discharge.
(3) (4) No later than 5 days from the date of the filing of a motion for discharge, the court shall hold a hearing on the motion, and unless the court finds that one of the reasons set forth in section (d)(3) existe, shall order that the defendant be brought to trial within 10 days. If the defendant is not brought to trial [1331]*1331within the 10 day period through no fault of the defendant, the defendant shall be forever discharged from the crime.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Bush
46 Fla. Supp. 2d 56 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
State v. Oller
45 Fla. Supp. 2d 61 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
State v. McAuley
46 Fla. Supp. 2d 9 (Florida Circuit Courts, 1991)
Livingston v. State
564 So. 2d 612 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Massey v. Graziano
564 So. 2d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Ferrante
561 So. 2d 422 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
542 So. 2d 1330, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 240, 1989 Fla. LEXIS 1287, 1989 WL 48933, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendment-to-florida-rule-of-criminal-procedure-3191-fla-1989.