In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280

Supreme Court of Florida

In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 2, 2023·No. SC2021-0929·Published

Opinion

Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023

In Re: Amendment to Florida SC2021-0929 Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280

The Court has considered the comments concerning Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, which was amended in the opinion issued August 26, 2021. As no further amendments to the rule are warranted at this time, this case is hereby final.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., dissents with an opinion.

LABARGA, J., dissenting.

In 2021, despite the robust discovery framework set forth in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the majority concluded that there was a need for additional protections against abusive discovery tactics in the private sector. To that end, the majority unilaterally adopted new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(h), which extended the “apex doctrine” to the private sector and granted special discovery protections to top-level corporate decision makers. See In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280, 324 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 2021).

CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Two

I dissented to the majority’s unilateral action because the existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were adequate to address the majority’s concerns about abusive discovery tactics—and the rules remain adequate to do so. Id. at 464-65 (Labarga, J., dissenting). As such, I continue to deem the adoption of rule 1.280(h) unwarranted.

I respectfully dissent to today’s order because the majority, having considered the comments filed in response to the adoption of rule 1.280(h), has determined that the rule should remain as originally adopted.

A True Copy Test:

SC2021-0929 11/2/2023

SO Served: JOSHUA E. DOYLE HEATHER S. TELFER JENNIFER MARIE VOSS CHRISTOPHER J. BAUM

CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Three

JUDSON LEE COHEN WILLIAM W. LARGE HON. ASHLEY MOODY FRANK CRUZ-ALVAREZ ROBERT L. CHRISTIE HENRY C. WHITAKER KANSAS R. GOODEN DANIEL B. ROGERS DANIEL W. BELL CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS JOHN W. HOGAN

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Supreme Court of Florida

THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023

In Re: Amendment to Florida SC2021-0929 Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280

The Court has considered the comments concerning Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, which was amended in the opinion issued August 26, 2021. As no further amendments to the rule are warranted at this time, this case is hereby final.

MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., dissents with an opinion.

LABARGA, J., dissenting.

In 2021, despite the robust discovery framework set forth in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the majority concluded that there was a need for additional protections against abusive discovery tactics in the private sector. To that end, the majority unilaterally adopted new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(h), which extended the “apex doctrine” to the private sector and granted special discovery protections to top-level corporate decision makers. See In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280, 324 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 2021).

CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Two

I dissented to the majority’s unilateral action because the existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were adequate to address the majority’s concerns about abusive discovery tactics—and the rules remain adequate to do so. Id. at 464-65 (Labarga, J., dissenting). As such, I continue to deem the adoption of rule 1.280(h) unwarranted.

I respectfully dissent to today’s order because the majority, having considered the comments filed in response to the adoption of rule 1.280(h), has determined that the rule should remain as originally adopted.

A True Copy Test:

SC2021-0929 11/2/2023

SO Served: JOSHUA E. DOYLE HEATHER S. TELFER JENNIFER MARIE VOSS CHRISTOPHER J. BAUM

CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Three

JUDSON LEE COHEN WILLIAM W. LARGE HON. ASHLEY MOODY FRANK CRUZ-ALVAREZ ROBERT L. CHRISTIE HENRY C. WHITAKER KANSAS R. GOODEN DANIEL B. ROGERS DANIEL W. BELL CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS JOHN W. HOGAN

In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, (Fla. 2023).

Pincite

In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.