In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280
This text of In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280 (In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2023
In Re: Amendment to Florida SC2021-0929 Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280
The Court has considered the comments concerning Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, which was amended in the opinion issued August 26, 2021. As no further amendments to the rule are warranted at this time, this case is hereby final.
MUÑIZ, C.J., and CANADY, COURIEL, GROSSHANS, FRANCIS, and SASSO, JJ., concur. LABARGA, J., dissents with an opinion.
LABARGA, J., dissenting.
In 2021, despite the robust discovery framework set forth in
the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, the majority concluded that
there was a need for additional protections against abusive
discovery tactics in the private sector. To that end, the majority
unilaterally adopted new Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(h),
which extended the “apex doctrine” to the private sector and
granted special discovery protections to top-level corporate decision
makers. See In re Amend. to Fla. Rule of Civ. Proc. 1.280, 324 So.
3d 459 (Fla. 2021). CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Two
I dissented to the majority’s unilateral action because the
existing Florida Rules of Civil Procedure were adequate to address
the majority’s concerns about abusive discovery tactics—and the
rules remain adequate to do so. Id. at 464-65 (Labarga, J.,
dissenting). As such, I continue to deem the adoption of rule
1.280(h) unwarranted.
I respectfully dissent to today’s order because the majority,
having considered the comments filed in response to the adoption of
rule 1.280(h), has determined that the rule should remain as
originally adopted.
A True Copy Test:
SC2021-0929 11/2/2023
SO Served: JOSHUA E. DOYLE HEATHER S. TELFER JENNIFER MARIE VOSS CHRISTOPHER J. BAUM CASE NO.: SC2021-0929 Page Three
JUDSON LEE COHEN WILLIAM W. LARGE HON. ASHLEY MOODY FRANK CRUZ-ALVAREZ ROBERT L. CHRISTIE HENRY C. WHITAKER KANSAS R. GOODEN DANIEL B. ROGERS DANIEL W. BELL CHRISTOPHER G. BURNS JOHN W. HOGAN
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
In Re: Amendment to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amendment-to-florida-rule-of-civil-procedure-1280-fla-2023.