In Re Amend. to the Florida Sm. Cl. Rules

601 So. 2d 1201, 1992 WL 163954
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 16, 1992
Docket79618
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 601 So. 2d 1201 (In Re Amend. to the Florida Sm. Cl. Rules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amend. to the Florida Sm. Cl. Rules, 601 So. 2d 1201, 1992 WL 163954 (Fla. 1992).

Opinion

601 So.2d 1201 (1992)

In re AMENDMENTS TO THE FLORIDA SMALL CLAIMS RULES.

No. 79618.

Supreme Court of Florida.

July 16, 1992.

Benjamin H. Hill, President, Tampa, Alan T. Dimond, President-elect, Miami, and John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, *1202 Tallahassee, of The Florida Bar, and Thomas B. Freeman, Chair, Small Claims Rules Committee, Clearwater, for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The Florida Bar Small Claims Rules Committee has submitted its quadrennial report of proposed changes to the Florida Small Claims Rules. We have jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 2(a) of the Florida Constitution.

The rules committee proposes substantive amendments to rule 7.070 and form 7.340 and adoption of new form 7.345; all other recommended changes are editorial. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130(c), the proposed amendments were submitted to The Board of Governors of The Florida Bar for its recommendation. The proposed substantive changes met with unanimous approval by the Board of Governors. The proposed changes were published for comment; only one comment dealing with form 7.340 was filed.

The rules committee recommends that rule 7.070, which currently provides for service by registered mail, be amended to provide for service by certified mail. The committee believes that, of the two methods of service by mail, service by certified mail is the more convenient and cost effective. The proposed amendment conforms rule 7.070 with the practice in most jurisdictions and makes the rule consistent with other Florida provisions that call for service by certified mail.

The rules committee recommends that an optional enforcement paragraph be added to final judgment form 7.340. The rules committee believes the enforcement paragraph will facilitate discovery for collection of a judgment by giving the judgment debtor notice of the information that will be required for initial discovery in aid of execution. If the optional enforcement paragraph is included in the final judgment, the judgment debtor will be ordered to complete a fact information sheet, form 7.343, and return it to the plaintiff or plaintiff's attorney within forty-five days of the final judgment, unless the judgment is satisfied or a motion for new trial or notice of appeal is filed. Thus, the judgment creditor will know within forty-five days from the entry of judgment whether it will be necessary to file for post-judgment relief. The rules committee believes that use of the enforcement paragraph will reduce court time and expense involved in post-judgment enforcement proceedings.

Finally, the rules committee recommends that we adopt new form 7.345, entitled Stipulation for Installment Settlement and Stay and Order Approving Stipulation. The committee believes that a standard settlement form providing for installment payments is preferable to the varying forms currently being used for settlements in the different counties.

The sole comment received in connection with these rules was filed by Judge Harvey Goldstein who points out that as currently drafted form 7.340 provides for statutory post-judgment interest on a total sum that includes the prejudgment interest award. This results in interest on interest or compound interest. See LaFaye v. Presser, 554 So.2d 610 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Smith, 527 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).

After reviewing the report of the rules committee and the comments of Judge Goldstein, we approve the appended amendments to the Florida Small Claims Rules. The amendments reflect the substantive changes recommended by the rules committee as well as a number of stylistic and editorial changes that are made to, among other things, ensure that the rules are gender neutral. We also have amended form 7.340 to ensure that post-judgment statutory interest will not be awarded on the prejudgment interest award. New language is indicated by underscoring; deletions are indicated by struck-through type. The committee notes are offered for explanation and guidance only and are not adopted as an official part of the rules. The amendments shall become effective January 1, 1993 at 12:01 a.m.

It is so ordered.

*1203 BARKETT, C.J. and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE

(a) Title. These rules shall be cited as Florida Small Claims Rules and may be abbreviated "SCRFla.Sm.Cl.R." These rules shall be construed to implement the simple, speedy, and inexpensive trial of actions at law in county courts.

(b) Scope. These rules are applicable to all actions at law of a civil nature in the county courts in which the demand or value of property involved does not exceed $2,500.00 exclusive of costs, interest, and attorneys' fees; if there is a difference between the time period prescribed by these rules and by Ssection 51.011, Florida Statutes, the statutory provision shall govern.

Committee Notes

1978 Amendment. The addition to (b) is designed to eliminate confusion caused by denomination of Ssection 51.011, Florida Statutes, as "Summary Procedure."

RULE 7.020. APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE

(a) Generally. Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.090(a), (b), and (c); 1.190(e); 1.210(b); 1.260; 1.410; and 1.560 are applicable in all actions covered by these rules.

(b) Discovery. Any party represented by an attorney is subject to discovery pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280-1.370 directed at said party, without order of court. ShouldIf a party proceeding without an attorney directs discovery to a party represented by an attorney, the represented party may also utilizeuse discovery pursuant to the above-mentioned rules without leave of court. Wheren a party is unrepresented and has not initiated discovery pursuant to Florida Rules of Civil Procedure 1.280-1.370, the opposing party shall not be entitled to initiate such discovery without leave of court. However, the time for such discovery procedures may be prescribed by the court.

(c) Additional Rules. In any particular action, the court may order that action to proceed under one1 or more additional Florida Rules of Civil Procedure on application of any party or the stipulation of all parties on the court's own motion.

Committee Notes

Former rule 7.020(b) is transferred to Rule 7.030.

1972 Amendment. Subdivision (a) is amended by giving the court authority to supply additional Rrules of Ccivil Pprocedure in any particular case on the application of a party, stipulation of all parties, or order on the court's own motion.

1978 Amendment. These proposed amendments would help prevent overreaching and the ability of one party to obtain judgment without giving the court the full opportunity to consider the merits of the case. Wheren attorneys are involved, itthe rule would preserve the ability of the parties to fully develop their cases.

RULE 7.040. CLERICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES OF CLERK

(a) Generally. The clerk of the circuit court or the clerk of the county court in those counties where such a clerk is provided (hereinafter referred to as the clerk) shall:

(1) Mmaintain a trial calendar,. and tThe placing of any action thereon with the date and time of trial is notice to all concerned of the order in which they may expect such action to be called,;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cadillac Fairview Corp. v. Resort at Indian Spring Ltd.
664 So. 2d 1041 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Central Bank of the South v. Seppala & Aho Construction Co.
658 So. 2d 1248 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Ghanbari v. Perrault
651 So. 2d 1257 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Sciandra v. First Union Nat. Bank
638 So. 2d 1009 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S v. Millar
627 So. 2d 1188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Central Constructors, Inc. v. Spectrum Contracting Co.
621 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
601 So. 2d 1201, 1992 WL 163954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amend-to-the-florida-sm-cl-rules-fla-1992.