In Re Amend. to Rules of Civ. Procedure

577 So. 2d 580, 1991 WL 46555
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 1991
Docket77020
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 577 So. 2d 580 (In Re Amend. to Rules of Civ. Procedure) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Amend. to Rules of Civ. Procedure, 577 So. 2d 580, 1991 WL 46555 (Fla. 1991).

Opinion

577 So.2d 580 (1991)

In re AMENDMENT TO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE-FORM 1.976 STANDARD FORMS FOR INTERROGATORIES.

No. 77020.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 4, 1991.

Wayne L. Cobb, Circuit Judge, Chairman, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, Dade City, Bruce J. Berman, Past Chairman, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, Miami, John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director, The Florida Bar, Tallahassee, and Theodore Babbitt, Chairman, Sub-Committee, Civil Procedure Rules Committee, West Palm Beach, for petitioner.

Michael C. Pendley of Bullock, Childs & Pendley, Jacksonville, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The Civil Procedure Rules Committee of The Florida Bar, responding to this Court's request pursuant to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.130, has petitioned the Court to adopt new standard interrogatories, amending the forms in the appendix to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.976.[*]

The petition seeks to substitute new form interrogatories for those presently existing. The presently existing form interrogatories consist of:

FORM 1. Nineteen interrogatories directed to plaintiffs in automobile negligence cases;
FORM 2. Sixteen interrogatories directed to defendants in automobile negligence cases; and
FORM 3. Six interrogatories directed to parties in marriage dissolution cases.

The committee proposes to substitute the existing forms with the following:

FORM 1: GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE — INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF (twenty-one interrogatories directed to plaintiffs in all personal injury cases);
FORM 2: GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY NEGLIGENCE — INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT (fourteen interrogatories directed to defendants in all personal injury cases);
FORM 3: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE — INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF (seven interrogatories to be used in conjunction with the general personal injury negligence interrogatories to plaintiffs);
FORM 4: MEDICAL MALPRACTICE — INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT (eight interrogatories to be used in conjunction with the general personal injury negligence interrogatories to defendants);
FORM 5: AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE — INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF (two interrogatories to be used in conjunction with the general personal injury negligence interrogatories to plaintiffs);
FORM 6: AUTOMOBILE NEGLIGENCE — INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT (eight interrogatories to be used in conjunction with the general personal injury negligence interrogatories to defendants); and
FORM 7: MARRIAGE DISSOLUTION — INTERROGATORIES TO PARTY (keeping the six existing interrogatories without revision but redesignating them under the heading FORM 7).

The committee approved the proposal by unanimous vote. However, the Board of Governors of The Florida Bar voted unanimously to urge this Court not to accept the proposed Medical Malpractice Interrogatories. The proposal was advertised by way of official notice in the January 15, 1991 edition of The Florida Bar News. Responses received pursuant to the notice addressed individual interrogatories.

Having considered all of the responses, we adopt the committee's proposal as revised by this Court. The existing FORM 1 and FORM 2 interrogatories are hereby rescinded; new form interrogatories, as revised and attached in the appendix to this *581 opinion, are approved; and the existing FORM 3 shall remain in effect but is hereby redesignated as FORM 7.

It is so ordered.

SHAW, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, BARKETT, GRIMES, KOGAN and HARDING, JJ., concur.

APPENDIX

                            FORM 1.
                    GENERAL PERSONAL INJURY
                 NEGLIGENCE — INTERROGATORIES
                         TO PLAINTIFF
(If answering for another person or entity, answer with respect
to that person or entity, unless otherwise stated.)
1. What is the name and address of the person answering these
  interrogatories, and, if applicable, the person's official
  position or relationship with the party to whom the
  interrogatories are directed?
2. List the names, business addresses, dates of employment and
  rates of pay regarding all employers, including
  self-employment, for whom you have worked in the past ten
  years.
3. List all former names and when you were known by those names.
  State all addresses where you have lived for the past ten
  years, the dates you lived at each address, your social
  security number, your date of birth, and if you are or have
  ever been married, the name of your spouse or spouses.
4. Do you wear glasses, contact lenses or hearing aids? If so,
  who prescribed them; when were they prescribed; when were your
  eyes or ears last examined; and what is the name and address of
  the examiner?
5. Have you ever been convicted of a crime, other than any
  juvenile adjudication, which under the law under which you were
  convicted was punishable by death or imprisonment in excess of
  one year, or that involved dishonesty or a false statement
  regardless of the punishment? If so, state as to each
  conviction, the specific crime, the date and the place of
  conviction.
6. Were you suffering from physical infirmity, disability, or
  sickness at the time of the incident described in the
  complaint? If so, what was the nature of the infirmity,
  disability, or sickness?
7. Did you consume any alcoholic beverages or take any drugs or
  medication within twelve hours before the time of the incident
  described in the complaint? If so, state the type and amount of
  alcoholic beverages, drugs or medication which were consumed
  and when and where you consumed them.
8. Describe in detail how the incident described in the complaint
  happened, including all actions taken by you to prevent the
  incident.
9. Describe in detail each act or omission on the part of any
  party to this lawsuit that you contend constituted negligence
  that was a contributing legal cause of the incident in
  question.
10. Were you charged with any violation of law (including any
  regulations or ordinances) arising out of the incident
  described in the complaint? If so, what was the nature of the
  charge; what plea, or answer, if any, did you enter to the
  charge; what court or agency heard the charge; was any written
  report prepared by anyone regarding this charge, and if so,
  what is the name and address of the person or entity that
  prepared the report; do you have a copy of the report; and was
  the testimony at any trial, hearing, or other proceeding on the
  charge recorded in any manner, and, if so, what was the name
  and address of the person who recorded the testimony?
11. Describe each injury for which you are claiming damages in
  this case, specifying the part of your body that was injured,
  the nature of the injury, and, as to any injuries you contend
  are permanent, the effects on you that you claim are permanent.
12. List each item of expense or damage, other than loss of
  income or earning capacity, that you claim to have incurred as
  a result of the incident described in the
*582  complaint, giving for each item the date incurred, the name and
  business address to whom each was paid or is owed, and the
  goods or services for which each was incurred.
13. Do you contend that you have lost any income, benefits, or
  earning capacity in the past or future as a result of the
  incident described in the complaint? If so, state the nature of
  the income, benefits, or earning capacity, and the amount and
  the method that you used in computing the amount.
14. 

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Howard v. Risch
959 So. 2d 308 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
577 So. 2d 580, 1991 WL 46555, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amend-to-rules-of-civ-procedure-fla-1991.