In re Ambrose
This text of 38 P.2d 808 (In re Ambrose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas, ante, p. 98 [38 Pac. (2d) 806], this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.
The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.
Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on December 27, 1934.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 P.2d 808, 3 Cal. App. 2d 752, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ambrose-calctapp-1934.