In re Ambrose

38 P.2d 808, 3 Cal. App. 2d 752, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1214
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedDecember 14, 1934
DocketCrim. No. 305
StatusPublished

This text of 38 P.2d 808 (In re Ambrose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Ambrose, 38 P.2d 808, 3 Cal. App. 2d 752, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1214 (Cal. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

BARNARD, P. J.

This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. With the exception of the name of the petitioner, the essential facts herein are identical with those appearing in the case of In re Salas, ante, p. 98 [38 Pac. (2d) 806], this day decided. For the reasons therein given, a similar order should be entered herein.

The writ is discharged and the petitioner remanded.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on December 27, 1934.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Salas
38 P.2d 806 (California Court of Appeal, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
38 P.2d 808, 3 Cal. App. 2d 752, 1934 Cal. App. LEXIS 1214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-ambrose-calctapp-1934.