In re Amber VV.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Amber VV.

279 A.D.2d 903, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 721

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 279 A.D.2d 903 (In re Amber VV.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Amber VV., 279 A.D.2d 903, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered November 9, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be permanently neglected, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

Our review of the record concerning petitioner’s four permanently neglected daughters, who have been in foster care for over five years, reveals that Family Court appropriately found it to be in the children’s best interests to terminate petitioner’s parental rights (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 [904]*904NY2d 136, 147; Family Ct Act § 631). There being no abuse of discretion (see generally, Matter of Christy C., 226 AD2d 770, 772, lv denied 88 NY2d 808), we affirm the order of Family Court.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mugglin, J.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Hester, Jr., J.), entered November 9, 1999, which granted petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b, to adjudicate respondent’s children to be permanently neglected, and terminated respondent’s parental rights.

Our review of the record concerning petitioner’s four permanently neglected daughters, who have been in foster care for over five years, reveals that Family Court appropriately found it to be in the children’s best interests to terminate petitioner’s parental rights (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 [904]*904NY2d 136, 147; Family Ct Act § 631). There being no abuse of discretion (see generally, Matter of Christy C., 226 AD2d 770, 772, lv denied 88 NY2d 808), we affirm the order of Family Court.

Mercure, J. P., Crew III, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 A.D.2d 903, 718 N.Y.S.2d 907, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-amber-vv-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack