In re Amanda Maying J.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Amanda Maying J.

208 A.D.2d 398, 618 N.Y.S.2d 210

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 13, 1994·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Family Court, New York County (Ruth J. Zuckerman, J.), entered March 13, 1992, which, inter alia, granted a petition to terminate respondent’s parental rights to the subject children on the ground of abandonment and transferred custody and guardianship to the petitioner [399] agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Undisputed testimony that respondent failed to contact the children or the agency for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, though able to do so, gave rise to a presumption of abandonment that respondent failed to rebut (Matter of Anthony M., 195 AD2d 315). Moreover, respondent was not prevented from visiting or communicating with the children during the requisite six-month period. Lastly, the court also properly found that termination of parental rights to allow for adoption by the foster mother was in the best interests of the children. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Family Court, New York County (Ruth J. Zuckerman, J.), entered March 13, 1992, which, inter alia, granted a petition to terminate respondent’s parental rights to the subject children on the ground of abandonment and transferred custody and guardianship to the petitioner [399] agency and the Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York for purposes of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Undisputed testimony that respondent failed to contact the children or the agency for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the petition, though able to do so, gave rise to a presumption of abandonment that respondent failed to rebut (Matter of Anthony M., 195 AD2d 315). Moreover, respondent was not prevented from visiting or communicating with the children during the requisite six-month period. Lastly, the court also properly found that termination of parental rights to allow for adoption by the foster mother was in the best interests of the children. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Rosenberger, Nardelli and Tom, JJ.

In re Amanda Maying J., 208 A.D.2d 398, 618 N.Y.S.2d 210 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 398 (In re Amanda Maying J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related