In Re Am

357 S.W.3d 320
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
DocketWD 74109
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 357 S.W.3d 320 (In Re Am) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Am, 357 S.W.3d 320 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

357 S.W.3d 320 (2012)

In the Interest of: A.M.
Juvenile Officer, Respondent,
v.
R.M. (Mother), Appellant.

No. WD 74109.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

January 31, 2012.

Carrie D. Mermis and Thomas J. Fritzlen, Jr., Kansas City, MO, for Appellant.

Lori L. Stipp, Kansas City, MO, for Respondent.

Ed Dougherty, Kansas City, MO, Guardian ad litem.

Before Division One: CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge, and THOMAS H. NEWTON and KAREN KING MITCHELL, Judges.

Order

PER CURIAM:

Mother, R.M., appeals the trial court's order terminating her parental rights to A.M. ("Son"). Mother raises three points on appeal: (1) the trial court erred when it determined that Mother has a permanent mental condition that prevents her from providing adequate care for Son and that she failed to care for Son; (2) the trial court erred when it determined that the harmful conditions giving the court jurisdiction over the case initially continued to exist, justifying termination; and (3) the trial court abused its discretion in finding that the best interests of the child justified termination. We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Wunder
357 S.W.3d 320 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 S.W.3d 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-am-moctapp-2012.