In re Alvarado

166 A.D.2d 932, 560 N.Y.S.2d 586

This text of 166 A.D.2d 932 (In re Alvarado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Alvarado, 166 A.D.2d 932, 560 N.Y.S.2d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Motion to vacate ex parte order pursuant to CPLR 5704 granted. Memorandum: The court’s power in reviewing an application for a change of name is limited (Matter of Halligan, 46 AD2d 170, 171-172). Here, there is no indication that petitioner’s change of name will be an instrumentality of fraud, misrepresentation, or interference with the rights of others. The fact that confusion may result from the change of name is not a sufficient reason to deny the application. "[CJonfusion is a normal concomitant of any name change” (Matter of Halligan, supra, at 172). Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Green, Pine and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Halligan
46 A.D.2d 170 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 A.D.2d 932, 560 N.Y.S.2d 586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alvarado-nyappdiv-1990.