in Re Alula F. Hagos
This text of in Re Alula F. Hagos (in Re Alula F. Hagos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-19-00765-CR
IN RE Alula F. HAGOS
Original Mandamus Proceeding 1
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
Delivered and Filed: November 13, 2019
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED
On October 29, 2019, relator filed a pro se petition for writ of mandamus requesting
immediate release from confinement. Relator is represented by trial counsel below; therefore,
relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1995). The absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus
petition will be treated as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v.
Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806, 806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).
Accordingly, relator’s pro se petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a).
Do not publish
1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2019-CR-9097, styled The State of Texas v. Alula F. Hagos, pending in the 226th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Velia J. Meza presiding.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
in Re Alula F. Hagos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-alula-f-hagos-texapp-2019.