In re Allmon

792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 279, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 360
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedOctober 21, 2016
DocketAppellate Case Nos. 2016-000209 and 2016-000163
StatusPublished

This text of 792 S.E.2d 239 (In re Allmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re Allmon, 792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 279, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 360 (S.C. 2016).

Opinion

ORDER

On May 22, 2013, the Court administratively suspended petitioner pursuant to Rule 419(d)(2) of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). On January 15, 2014, the Court accepted an Agreement for Discipline by Consent en[280]*280tered into between petitioner and the Office of Disciplinary-Counsel and suspended petitioner from the practice of law for one year retroactive to January 16, 2013, the date of petitioner’s interim suspension. In the Matter of Allmon, 407 S.C. 24, 753 S.E.2d 544 (2014). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 419(e), SCACR, and a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

After thorough consideration of the entire record, the Court grants both Petitions for Reinstatement.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

We would deny both Petitions for Reinstatement.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Allmon
753 S.E.2d 544 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
792 S.E.2d 239, 418 S.C. 279, 2016 S.C. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allmon-sc-2016.