In Re Allison

Missouri Court of Appeals

In Re Allison

265 S.W.3d 881, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2008 WL 4472930

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 7, 2008

DocketED 89274

StatusPublished

This text of 265 S.W.3d 881 (In Re Allison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Allison, 265 S.W.3d 881, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2008 WL 4472930 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Allison (Allison) appeals from the court’s Judgment and Commitment Order (judgment) based upon a jury verdict and finding Allison to be a sexually violent predator and ordering him committed to the custody of the director of the Department of Mental Health.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Allison (Allison) appeals from the court’s Judgment and Commitment Order (judgment) based upon a jury verdict and finding Allison to be a sexually violent predator and ordering him committed to the custody of the director of the Department of Mental Health.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 S.W.3d 881, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1366, 2008 WL 4472930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allison-moctapp-2008.