In re Allison C.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re Allison C.

193 A.D.2d 676, 598 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4671

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 10, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 193 A.D.2d 676 (In re Allison C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re Allison C., 193 A.D.2d 676, 598 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the intervenor Bernard C. appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated April 13, 1990, as, after a hearing, dismissed the petition alleging abuse and neglect of Allison C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no merit to the appellant’s contention that the Family Court erred in determining that the evidence adduced at the lengthy fact-finding hearing was insufficient to support [677]*677a finding of sexual abuse. The evidence adduced by the petitioner failed to prove the allegations by the requisite preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]).

We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the intervenor Bernard C. appeals from so much of an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Friedman, J.), dated April 13, 1990, as, after a hearing, dismissed the petition alleging abuse and neglect of Allison C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

We find no merit to the appellant’s contention that the Family Court erred in determining that the evidence adduced at the lengthy fact-finding hearing was insufficient to support [677]*677a finding of sexual abuse. The evidence adduced by the petitioner failed to prove the allegations by the requisite preponderance of the evidence (see, Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]).

We have reviewed the appellant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Thompson, J. P., Eiber, Ritter and Joy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

193 A.D.2d 676, 598 N.Y.S.2d 970, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4671, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allison-c-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack