In Re Allied Delivery Systems Co.

52 B.R. 85
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
DecidedMarch 27, 1985
Docket10-55544
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 52 B.R. 85 (In Re Allied Delivery Systems Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re Allied Delivery Systems Co., 52 B.R. 85 (Ohio 1985).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

ALICE M. BATCHELDER, Bankruptcy Judge.

This matter came on for hearing on March 7, 1985, on the Application of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, *86 Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America and the Teamsters National Freight Industry Negotiating Committee (the “Union”) to be appointed to the Unsecured Creditor’s Committee. On consideration of the arguments of counsel and the briefs the Court finds that the Application should not be granted and makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its ruling.

Allied Delivery Systems Co. filed a petition for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on December 24, 1984. A creditors’ committee was subsequently appointed consisting largely of trade creditors. The Union now seeks to be added to the Committee.

Although the Court acknowledges that the Union has a claim for purposes of § 1102(a) it notes that the Union has failed to demonstrate that the Committee as composed is unrepresentative of the general unsecured creditors. The Court additionally notes that: 1) the priority claimants which the Union represents differ in kind from the general unsecured claimants; 2) the adversarial relationship between the Debtor and the Union as a result of the break-down of negotiations between them and the filing before the NLRB of an unfair labor practice charge, renders the appointment of the Union to the Committee inappropriate; and 3) the Local 407 Insurance Fund whom the Union seeks to represent, among others, was appointed to the Committee by this Court and declined to serve.

Accordingly, the Union’s Application for appointment to the Creditors’ Committee is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Plabell Rubber Products
140 B.R. 179 (N.D. Ohio, 1992)
In Re Richmond Tank Car Co.
93 B.R. 504 (S.D. Texas, 1988)
Matter of Enduro Stainless, Inc.
59 B.R. 603 (N.D. Ohio, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 B.R. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-allied-delivery-systems-co-ohnb-1985.